[cc-ed to haskell@, as this discussion is about [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are four things sent to the haskell list@
1) Calls for papers
2) Annoucements
3) Oleg's stuff (which are really announcements of a library or technique)
4) Off topic stuff
I'm initially only proposing to mop up category 4,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 01:00:40PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
>
> in other words, people were meant to subscribe either
> to haskell or to haskell+haskell-cafe, and posting to
> haskell was meant to be a flag able to raise a topic
> briefly over the general din in haskell-cafe.
Do people think t
in other words, people were meant to subscribe either
to haskell or to haskell+haskell-cafe, and posting to
haskell was meant to be a flag able to raise a topic
briefly over the general din in haskell-cafe.
Do people think that is working?
i don't think it is working anymore. haskell-cafe w
Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Forgive me, but I would much prefer a newsgroup to a mailing list.
So do I, that's why I'm reading and posting through gmane :) You still
have to be subscribed (to haskell@ but not haskell-cafe@) in order to
post but there is a mailman option to not send you e-mail (s
Forgive me, but I would much prefer a newsgroup to a mailing list.
True, I could unsubscribe now and just browse the mailman archives -
but for posting, I'd have to temporarily re-subscribe, which is awkward.
(Indeed that's the only reason I'm not doing it.)
We already have comp.lang.haskell. - B
Hi
> Forgive me, but I would much prefer a newsgroup to a mailing list.
>
> True, I could unsubscribe now and just browse the mailman archives -
> but for posting, I'd have to temporarily re-subscribe, which is awkward.
> (Indeed that's the only reason I'm not doing it.)
I believe you can post fr
Claus Reinke wrote:
so everything that would be of interest to all haskellers,
including those too busy to follow haskell-cafe, would go to haskell,
everything else would go to haskell-cafe.
but even those topics starting out on haskell are meant
to migrate to haskell-cafe after a few posts at
From: Isaac Dupree
I haven't been able to see how it makes sense to subscribe to
haskell@ but not haskell-cafe -- because if a discussion interested
you, and went in-depth, you might want to be able to read the whole
thread! (It is possible to read the archives, but that doesn't
help i
