On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:42:50 +0100, Duncan Coutts
wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:47 +0900, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:48:13 -0700, Lyle Kopnicky
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Great! But what happened to the time package? It was in 6.10.1. Has it been
>> >intentionally excluded from
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:47 +0900, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:48:13 -0700, Lyle Kopnicky
> wrote:
>
> >Great! But what happened to the time package? It was in 6.10.1. Has it been
> >intentionally excluded from 6.10.2?
Yes, the maintainer of the time package asked for it to
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:48:13 -0700, Lyle Kopnicky
wrote:
>Great! But what happened to the time package? It was in 6.10.1. Has it been
>intentionally excluded from 6.10.2?
Then I should probably hold off on installing the new version for now.
Any estimate on when this problem will be fixed?
-- Be
