On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:56:38PM -0700, John Meacham wrote:
for now, these are equivalent.
ghc --make Main.hs -o foo
jhc Main.hs -o foo
jhc is effectivly always in --make mode.
I suggest you make it possible not to operate in --make mode. A build
system usually wants to know which
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:54:42AM -0700,
John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 375 lines which said:
There are still substantial issues which need to be overcome before
jhc can be used for general Haskell programing
Do you plan to support ghc command-line flags? Because I tried
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:14:53PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:54:42AM -0700,
John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 375 lines which said:
There are still substantial issues which need to be overcome before
jhc can be used for general Haskell
On Apr 27, 2005, at 6:56 PM, John Meacham wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:14:53PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
* It takes ridiculous amounts of memory and CPU. A gigabyte of RAM
usage is not unheard of.
Confirmed :-{
After the initial bootstrap of the libraries, future compiles will be
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Meacham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very interesting! What license uses jhc? The COPYING file seems to be empty.
It is under the GPL.
Does that mean my program will be GPL if I compile it with jhc?
--
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
Does that mean my program will be GPL if I compile it with jhc?
No; cf. gcc.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.
On Tuesday 26 April 2005 11:15, Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
Does that mean my program will be GPL if I compile it with jhc?
No; cf. gcc.
Fr details see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF
Ben
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:26:29AM +0200, Antonio Regidor Garca wrote:
Very interesting! What license uses jhc? The COPYING file seems to be empty.
It is under the GPL.
For some reason the darcs.cgi browser isn't displaying it, but if you
look in the repo directly it is there.
Some parts are
