(moving to Libraries list)
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
The Yampa people and I (the Grapefruit maintainer) already agreed to introduce
a top-level FRP namespace instead of putting FRP under Control or whatever.
Graphics.UI is a bad choice in my opinion, since not all user interfaces are
graphical (
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 19:01 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> Hello Ashley,
>
> Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:12:18 AM, you wrote:
>
> > Is there any interest in implementing a top level "<-" to run monadic code?
>
> yes, definitely. as it's hard to develop "real" app w/o using global
> vars, h98 sti
Hello Ashley,
Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:12:18 AM, you wrote:
> Is there any interest in implementing a top level "<-" to run monadic code?
yes, definitely. as it's hard to develop "real" app w/o using global
vars, h98 still remains "unreal" language
but from my POV it's important to push this
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Adrian Hey wrote:
> (Moving to Haskell cafe)
>
> Edward Kmett wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Ashley Yakeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any interest in implementing a top level "<-" to run monadic code?
>>>
>>
>> This is actually
(Moving to Haskell cafe)
Edward Kmett wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Ashley Yakeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any interest in implementing a top level "<-" to run monadic code?
This is actually implemented in jhc. See the 'top level actions' section of
http://repetae.net/
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Ashley Yakeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any interest in implementing a top level "<-" to run monadic code?
>
This is actually implemented in jhc. See the 'top level actions' section of
http://repetae.net/computer/jhc/manual.html
-Edward Kmett
___
Is there any interest in implementing a top level "<-" to run monadic code?
Currently this sort of thing is done with unsafePerformIO and switching
off inlining with some pragma. Indeed, the 'atomically' haddock actually
advises doing this to declare top-level TVars. The same trick is used in
John Meacham wrote:
> Now, my mdo proposal as written would have "hello" outputed exactly once
> at module start up time no matter what, whether x is demanded or not. it
> is equivalant to a program transformation that collects all the top
> level initializers and declarations, puts them all in a m
