Laszlo Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chp 8 of the Haskell Report says:
>
> > In this chapter the entire Haskell Prelude is given. It constitutes
> > a *specification* for the Prelude.
>
> My question is how strictly this word "specification" is to be
> interpreted? I can think of a stric
Hi,
Chp 8 of the Haskell Report says:
In this chapter the entire Haskell Prelude is given. It constitutes a
*specification* for the Prelude.
Many of the definitions are written with clarity rather than
efficiency in mind, and it is not required
that the specification be implemented as shown h
