> "Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sigbjorn> Advice on what's the most appropriate ORB to target
Sigbjorn> would be greatly appreciated, there's already quite a
Sigbjorn> selection to choose from (ORBit, Mico, omniORB etc.)
omniORB2 is CORBA-2 and IIOP com
On 14-Aug-1998, Timothy Robin BARBOUR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "David" == David Glen JEFFERY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> David> Depending on how you do it, the choice of ORB may not be
> David> such a huge issue. Our (infantile) Mercury implementation
> David> does not t
> "Marko" == Marko Schuetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marko> FYI, there is also MICO:
Marko> http://www.vsb.cs.uni-frankfurt.de/~mico/
The MICO home page says:
The difference to other free imlementations is, that MICO is developed for
educational
purposes [...]
As opposed
> "David" == David Glen JEFFERY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Depending on how you do it, the choice of ORB may not be
David> such a huge issue. Our (infantile) Mercury implementation
David> does not talk to the ORB directly, but rather goes via C++
David> stubs and skele
>From: Daan Leijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>[...]
>> Allthough we have made a binding now for COM, it would indeed be great
>> if we could also have a CORBA binding; it is of vital importance that
>> Haskell can talk with the outside world and the more languages it knows, the
>> better :-)
>> Since
From: Daan Leijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> Allthough we have made a binding now for COM, it would indeed be great
> if we could also have a CORBA binding; it is of vital importance that
> Haskell can talk with the outside world and the more languages it knows, the
> better :-)
> Since there is
From: Sigbjorn Finne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Lennart Augustsson writes:
> >
> > > I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> > > H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> > > means that they are rather useless to me.
> > I agree!
> >
>
> Mud sticks, so may I sugge
> "Erik" == Erik Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Erik> Hi Tim,
>> The Haskell Server page claims that one advantage of COM is that it
>> "ships for free with windows". This suggests that the existence of a
>> genuinely free CORBA ORB has been overlooked.
>>
>> IMHO ignoring CORBA is cutti
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty writes:
>
[snip]
>
> Although, you continue with
>
> Ideally, it should be possible to substitute COM for any
> other component technology. Experience may prove
> otherwise, but implementing an interface to one component
> technology is a non-trivial amount of
On 09-Aug-1998, Erik Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> >The Haskell Server page claims that one advantage of COM is that it
> >"ships for free with windows". This suggests that the existence of a
> >genuinely free CORBA ORB has been overlooked.
> >
> >IMHO ignoring CORBA is cutting
> I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> means that they are rather useless to me.
>
Lets clarify some points:
- H/Direct is a OSF DCE IDL compiler which can not only
generate COM specific bindings but also for example
From: Timothy Robin BARBOUR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sigbjorn> As part of H/Direct, we're going to support something
> Sigbjorn> similar to JNI for the new Hugs/GHC system, see
>
> Sigbjorn>http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/
Lennart Augustsson writes:
>
> > I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> > H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> > means that they are rather useless to me.
> I agree!
>
Mud sticks, so may I suggest you actually take the time to read the
available docs b
> I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> means that they are rather useless to me.
I agree!
-- Lennart
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty writes:
>
..
>
> I am quite unhappy to see these developments (e.g.,
> H/Direct) being based on some proprietary standards, as it
> means that they are rather useless to me.
>
Sigh, it's not *based* on proprietary standards - whatever gave you
that idea? The IDL com
Timothy Robin BARBOUR writes:
> > "Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Sigbjorn> As part of H/Direct, we're going to support something
> Sigbjorn> similar to JNI for the new Hugs/GHC system, see
>
> Sigbjorn>http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/fp/software/hdire
Hi Tim,
>The Haskell Server page claims that one advantage of COM is that it
>"ships for free with windows". This suggests that the existence of a
>genuinely free CORBA ORB has been overlooked.
>
>IMHO ignoring CORBA is cutting Haskell off from the open software
>world (including about 7 million
> "Sigbjorn" == Sigbjorn Finne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sigbjorn> As part of H/Direct, we're going to support something
Sigbjorn> similar to JNI for the new Hugs/GHC system, see
Sigbjorn>http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/fp/software/hdirect
[...]
Sigbjorn> This document express
18 matches
Mail list logo
