Re: Haskell 98 Report: October release

2001-10-04 Thread Christian Sievers
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Feedback please... One typo: In the change for Page 93, Appendix A, Standard Prelude the comment should not talk about a "fixtity declaration". ^ Bye Christian Sievers ___ Haske

Re: Haskell 98 Report: October release

2001-10-02 Thread Iavor S. Diatchki
hello, this was a bug in the report, the "B" import should not be qualified. it has been fixed in the latest version of the report. > [Sept 2001] > "For example > > module A ( module B, C.f, g ) where -- an invalid module > import qualified B(f,g) > import qualified

Re: Haskell 98 Report: October release

2001-10-02 Thread Malcolm Wallace
> the main things I've done this time is to > * revise yet again the wording about export lists Two of the changes to Export Decls (Section 5.2) now conflict with each other. [Oct 2001] "The form `module M' abbreviates the set of all entities whose unqualified name, e, is in scope, and

Haskell 98 Report: October release

2001-10-02 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
It's that time of the month! Another iteration of the Revised Haskell 98 Report! http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/haskell98-revised I'm happy to say that my orbit is diminishing in radius and I shall shortly turn into a black hole. Seriously, the main things I've done this time