Re: Haskell Language Design Questions

2000-12-30 Thread Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Sat, 30 Dec 2000 14:50:04 +1100, Fergus Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: It's just something that didn't make it into Haskell 98. Hugs and ghc offer a language extension for that. It will almost certainly be in the next revision of Haskell. See

Haskell Language Design Questions

2000-12-29 Thread Doug Ransom
1. Is the lack of dynamic binding of functions by design or because it was too much effort to be justified at the time the language was designed? In object oriented programming there can be several implementations of the same interface, and they can be stored in the same collection. 2. It

Re: Haskell Language Design Questions

2000-12-29 Thread Fergus Henderson
On 29-Dec-2000, Doug Ransom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Is the lack of dynamic binding of functions by design or because it was too much effort to be justified at the time the language was designed? In object oriented programming there can be several implementations of the same interface,