- Original Message -
From: "Colin Paul Adams"
...
> But this seems to assume there is a one-to-one mapping of upper-case
> to lower-case equivalent, and vice-versa. Apparently this is not
> so.
True. It's quite tricky. See below.
> It seems that whilst the Unicode database's definit
19 Oct 2001 06:09:09 +0100, Colin Paul Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> But this seems to assume there is a one-to-one mapping of upper-case
> to lower-case equivalent, and vice-versa. Apparently this is not so.
Indeed, but there exists a default locale-independent case mapping.
Language-speci
I have accidentally noticed another problem in the revised Haskell
report (actually the library report, this time).
in module Char, toLower and toUpper appear to be under-specified (and
indeed, the whole module looks a little suspect)
Exactly what is wrong with them I find hard to say, and even
