On Tue, 2 May 2000, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
> Well, all this is ambiguous. A "big picture" and
> "something moderate" contradict themselves IMHO.
Not necessary. How about moderately big picture? :-)
Seriously, I really worry that Sergey's initiative
does not receive
A sane mathematical structure - or rather: sane description
of math structures in Haskell is something which worries
me for years. On this list, on funct. newsgroup and elsewhere
this is a recurring, cyclic theme.
-- And we have still this horrible Num hierarchy, which does
not correspond to anyt
Jan Skibinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
First off, from what I remember of it, I like the BAP, too, having
stumbled over the limitation of the Haskell types a couple of times.
> + What extra features would be really desired and, first of
> all - WHY? How will it make Haskell
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Tom Pledger wrote:
>
> Here's an example of something which could be done, without major
> language extensions: insert a partial ordering class between Eq and
> Ord. (It's something I've advocated before, so I won't dwell on it
> this time.)
That's why some sort o
