Re: More on Quantum vectors...

Frank Atanassow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would not be surprised to find this article appearing in the next Scientific > American. > > Consider these gems: > > "Finger-Length Ratios and Sexual Orientation," Terrance J. Williams, > > "Why are Toads Right-Handed?" Nature, T. Naitoh and

Re: More on Quantum vectors...

In a second round I have made several improvements to the formalism of QuantumVector module. Module Momenta is also adjusted to match the changes. The most notable improvement is related to tensor products of vector spaces. Previous definition was

Re: More on Quantum vectors...

I cannot resist replying to this remark: Jan Skibinski writes: > Now, someone, somewhere could have written a paper > "Isolation properties of sandwiched materials", but > how on earth he/she would ever invented something > of this sort in the first place or - granted that

Re: More on Quantum vectors...

Jan Skibinski writes: > Well, Frank, there are zillions of papers and books on > mathematical background of QM and I certainly would not add > anything of a consequence here. A theoretical foundation of > Quantum Mechanics is the Hilbert space. Dirac's formalism > is

Re: More on Quantum vectors...

Hey, I am reading this thread to , it is pretty interesting :) Sometime I hope to have time to look at the package in detail, but the idea is of course very interesting. + Ron Legere -- http://www.its.caltech.edu/~legere Caltech Quantum Optics

Re: More on Quantum vectors...

On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Frank Atanassow wrote: > Jerzy Karczmarczuk writes: > > ...although apparently there are exactly two readers/writers > > of this thread on this list. Oh, well, it is as boring as any > > other subject. > > I'm reading it. I think this field of application could be very

Re: More on Quantum vectors...

On Mon, Jun 5, 2000 14:57 Uhr, Frank Atanassow wrote: >Jerzy Karczmarczuk writes: > > ...although apparently there are exactly two readers/writers > > of this thread on this list. Oh, well, it is as boring as any > > other subject. > >I'm reading it. I think this field

Re: More on Quantum vectors...

Frank Atanassow wrote: > ... maybe Jerzy could write up something which elaborates this remark: > > > I confess that I became interested in Haskell *because* of its possible > > applications to scientific computing, and *in particular* to quantum > > physics. (And some statistical physics; th

RE: More on Quantum vectors...

I'm reading it too. Fascinating stuff. I'm comfortable with Haskell code but struggle with Dirac's book. Expressing this stuff in Haskell makes it crystal clear (at least to me). Look forward to reading more. Mike Stout > -Original Message- > From: Frank Atanassow [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]