Andrew U. Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
write on 24 Aug 2000 on basAlgPropos
> i am interested in an improvement of the numeric classes and hope the
> proposal by Mechveliani can contribute to this.
basAlgPropos contains such suggestion.
> [..]
> i would suggest that the authors separate the pr
George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes 05 May 2000
> I think the way to proceed with basAlgPropos is to implement it
> outside the language as a library.
> [..]
> GHC
> [..]
> At the moment I feel it would be better to let it evolve.
You mean: non-standard library.
There is no need in decis
NO NO.
Almost like Field but maybe, non-commutative.
George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 03 May 2000
> There are two problems with freezing large modules into
> languages:
> (1) they make life harder for implementors
> (2) when you want to use them, it usually turns out that there is some
>slight niggle you want which the implementor
