Sun, 21 May 2000 01:00:18 +1000, Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
[...]
I still think that a better solution is to design classes used in
resolving special syntax in a such straightforward way that everybody
should be happy to use, even when he throws away most of Prelude.
fromIntege
On 20-May-2000, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sat, 20 May 2000 20:45:47 +1000, Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
>
> > For the next version of Haskell, I propose changing the wording to
> >
> > The integer literal i is equivalent to fromInteger i. Normal
On 20-May-2000, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sat, 20 May 2000 20:45:47 +1000, Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> > This is somewhat ambiguous; if it is really intended that unary -
> > always refer to the negate function define in the Prelude, it really
> > oug
Sat, 20 May 2000 20:45:47 +1000, Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> For the next version of Haskell, I propose changing the wording to
>
> The integer literal i is equivalent to fromInteger i. Normally
> fromInteger is a method in the standard Prelude class Num (see Secti
On 19-May-2000, S.D.Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder how to make the user prelude BPrelude to replace
> 2 + x :: T
>
> with (Additive.fromInteger 2 :: T) + x
> rather than (Num.fromInteger 2 :: T) + x
> ?
That seems like a quite reason
Fri, 19 May 2000 18:59:03 +0400 (MSD), S.D.Mechveliani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> I wonder how to make the user prelude BPrelude to replace
> 2 + x :: T
>
> with (Additive.fromInteger 2 :: T) + x
> rather than (Num.fromInteger 2 :: T) + x
> ?
I see
I wonder how to make the user prelude BPrelude to replace
2 + x :: T
with (Additive.fromInteger 2 :: T) + x
rather than (Num.fromInteger 2 :: T) + x
?
For BPrelude hides Num and moves +, fromInteger ... to
Additive. So, the compiler reports
