Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16-Mar-2000, Jan Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wonder if someone could tell me more about the speed and size of compiled
> > Haskell code.
> ...
> > What about Haskell 98 versus (I anticipat
On 16-Mar-2000, Jan Brosius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if someone could tell me more about the speed and size of compiled
> Haskell code.
...
> What about Haskell 98 versus (I anticipate) Haskell 2
There should be no significant differences as far as performance goes
Thu, 16 Mar 2000 18:00:35 +, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> GHC and HBC tend to produce code that is, broadly speaking,
> equally fast,
I experienced each of these compilers producing code about 3 times
faster than the other for a simple program.
--
__("
> I wonder if someone could tell me more about the speed and size of
> compiled Haskell code. E.g. if one uses GHC to compile Haskell code
> into native code what speed performance can be expected versus a same
> program written in C (Hints about the nhc compiler are welcome).
W
totype and recode in C
I hope this gives you a place to start.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Brosius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 8:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: speed and size of compiled Haskell code
>
>
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I wonder if someone could tell me more about the speed and size of compiled
Haskell code.
E.g. if one uses GHC to compile Haskell code into native code what speed
performance can be expected versus a same program written in C (Hints about
the nhc compiler are welcome).
Is lazyness as good as
