Re: [Haskell] offside rule question

2005-07-15 Thread Axel Simon
Brian, On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 19:58 -0500, Brian Smith wrote: > On 7/14/05, Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 03:15:32AM +0200, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > > > The offside rule is patronizing. :) > > > It tries to force you to lay out your program in a certain wa

Re: [Haskell] offside rule question

2005-07-15 Thread Tomasz Zielonka
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:10:16AM +0100, Axel Simon wrote: > I agree with Frederik since I've been bitten by that rule before. > Defining a single function like so: > > let a very long definition of "a" = and the body has to be here > is a very long applicatio

[Haskell] Early registration: GPCE'05 -- Generative Programming and Component Engineering

2005-07-15 Thread Eelco Visser
CALL for EARLY REGISTRATION (deadline July 29) -- 4th International Conference on Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE'05) Sep 29 - Oct 1, 2005, Tallinn (Eston

Re: [Haskell] offside rule question

2005-07-15 Thread Jon Fairbairn
On 2005-07-15 at 10:49+0200 Tomasz Zielonka wrote: > But you can format it this way: > > let a very long definition of "a" = > and the body has to be here is a very long application to "and" > but using long arguments like definition is not that bad > in or > > let a very long

[Haskell] Re: A MonadPlusT with fair operations and pruning

2005-07-15 Thread oleg
on Jun 22 Andrew Bromage wrote about the usefulness of soft-cuts and "don't care" non-determinism in non-deterministic computations in Haskell. > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2005-June/016037.html Thank you very much for your explanation, it was helpful indeed. You noted, > Some of