On 11-Feb-2001, Brian Boutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fergus Henderson wrote:
> >
> > On 09-Feb-2001, Brian Boutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Patrik Jansson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The fact that equality can be trivially defined as bottom does not imply
> > > > that it should be a superc
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:37:28PM +1300, Brian Boutel wrote:
> Let me restate my question more carefully:
>
> Can you demonstrate a revised hierarchy without Eq? What would happen to
> Ord and the numeric classes with default class method definitions that
> use (==) either explicitly or in patte
Fergus Henderson wrote:
>
> On 09-Feb-2001, Brian Boutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Patrik Jansson wrote:
> > >
> > > The fact that equality can be trivially defined as bottom does not imply
> > > that it should be a superclass of Num, it only explains that there is an
> > > ugly way of worki
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
>
> Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:09:59 +1300, Brian Boutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
>
> > Can you demonstrate a revised hierarchy without Eq? What would happen to
> > Ord, and the numeric classes that require Eq because they need signum?
>
> signum doesn't require Eq.
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 11:25:46AM -0500, Dylan Thurston wrote:
> Can you elaborate? What do you mean by signum for functions? The
> pointwise signum? Then abs would be the pointwise abs as well, right?
> That might work, but I'm nervous because I don't know the semantics
> for signum/abs in s
Sat, 10 Feb 2001 11:25:46 -0500, Dylan Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Can you elaborate? What do you mean by signum for functions?
> The pointwise signum?
Yes.
> Then abs would be the pointwise abs as well, right?
Yes.
> That might work, but I'm nervous because I don't know the semant
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 07:17:57AM +, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:09:59 +1300, Brian Boutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
>
> > Can you demonstrate a revised hierarchy without Eq? What would happen to
> > Ord, and the numeric classes that require Eq because they need s
Hello,
Is this the right place to ask Mondrian questions?
I will assume so. Is Mondrian only meant to work with
.NET?? If so, what good is it as an Internet scripting
language? I.e. what good is it as a language if it only
runs in Microsoft's .NET environment?? I tried to
