Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
> 1. I didn't find ANYTHING about FP on your pages,
> only that accusations.
I already explained that was not an accusation.
How does it follow that since there's nothing else about FP on my website
that I "never had anything to do with functional languages"? Do you re
Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
> 2. You neglect, and I suspect that you do it on purpose, that the main
>driving force behind the evolution of Haskell is *RESEARCH*. An issue
>absent from many "popular" languages which are meant to be
> immediately
>exploitable with very flat learning curv
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Jason J. Libsch wrote:
> The reason that this paper so peaked my interest is that i have been
> working on a system that is tremendously similar to the one described in
> this paper- it's as if Dr. Reekie Van Eck phreaked my head or notebooks
> (unfortunatly, my designs have
The reason that this paper so peaked my interest is that i have been
working on a system that is tremendously similar to the one described in
this paper- it's as if Dr. Reekie Van Eck phreaked my head or notebooks
(unfortunatly, my designs have not progressed past pen and paper.) from
the other si
Hi, Good find!
NB: I just skimmed the paper so far, but it is a long-term area of interest
for me...
I find most of these visual systems awkward to use in practice. Quite often
this is because they have very poor interface designs (they are like old
modal CAD systems). This is troublesome, leadi
I recently ran across a paper, Visual Haskell- a First Attempt, and was
tremendously impressed. Has anybody here played with this language or
read the paper? I would be interested to hear other's opinion on such a
language.
http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/~johnr/papers/visual.html
/jason
Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:59:46 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), S. Alexander Jacobson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/comp.lang.python/python_varieties.html
>
> Of particular note here is Vyper implemented in OCAML, which adds tail
> calls, list comprehensions, lexical
FYI, there are multiple python implementations out there.
See
http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/comp.lang.python/python_varieties.html
Of particular note here is Vyper implemented in OCAML, which adds tail
calls, list comprehensions, lexical scoping, full garbage collection, and
pattern matchin
S. Alexander Jacobsen wrote:
| Although I think Haskell is a beautiful language, Jelovic is right on
his
| core points, Haskell implementations don't meet the needs of
| the working programmer.
[...]
I also largely agree with Jelovic, and I take what he says as
constructive criticism.
One obs
Dejan Jelovic wrote:
>
> Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote:
>
> > Over and over again the same silly song, by a person who - visibly -
> > had never anything to do with functional languages, who thinks now
> > about hiring some C and java programmers living in Belgrade
>
> I don't understand how you ded
10 matches
Mail list logo
