On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 08:46:00PM -0500, Matt Harden wrote:
In a lazy language like Haskell, a list is essentially the same as a
lazy stream
Sorry. I've been using Haskell a few months now, and I really did
know that, but got so confused going round in circles with a similar
problem I'm
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 11:34:45AM +, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
...
I found a way to express map and zipWith, but it's quite ugly. I would
be happy to have a better way.
class Map c' a' c a | c' - a', c - a, c' a - c, c a' - c' where
map :: (a' - a) - c' - c
...
I have decided to escape the world of Perl into something more
definitional. I gave up on CAML and Erlang because they contain
imperative elements and I am tired of that form of coding. So, I have
narrowed it down to Haskell and Mercury.
The attractive things about Haskell are:
- automatic
On 08-Apr-2001, Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1- Haskell is a pure functional language, but I don't see any support
for backtracking or other logic features... but my guess is you have
some way of handling this? How?
The usual way of handling backtracking in Haskell is using
