"Taesch, Luc" wrote:
>
> do u isolate just the datatype, or a few related with, in a very small file (header
>like, i would say)
> or some basic accessor function with it ?
>
> isnt it leading to massiv quantities of small files ?
Asuming you have some typed AST with many mutually recursive
da
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Erik Meijer wrote:
> Interestingly enough, I have the same feeling with Python!
Speaking of problems with Haskell, almost every time I write a larger
program, I'm frustrated with lack of efficient arrays/hashtables in the
standard. I know about ghc (I|U|M)Arrays for arrays an
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Wojciech Moczydlowski, Jr wrote:
> data Array type_of_objects_stored = ... -- abstract
> data MArray a b = ... -- abstract
>
> put :: Int -> a -> Array a -> MArray a ()
Probably you meant:
put :: Int -> a -> MArray a ()
> get :: Array a -> MArray a a
get :: Int -> M
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Michal Gajda wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, Wojciech Moczydlowski, Jr wrote:
> Probably you meant:
> put :: Int -> a -> MArray a ()
> get :: Int -> MArray a a
> runMArray :: Int -> a -> MArray a b -> b
You're of course right. I should have reread my letter before sending.
>
