I have answered to this post but by mistake I was looking at the older
version of the report.
Vincenzo
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 10:35:33 +
Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new copyright notice is inconsistent. If it is not otherwise
> changed, I suggest that the first clause, "The publisher intends this
> Report to belong to the entire Haskell community, ..." be deleted.
May I know wh
The new copyright notice is inconsistent. If it is not otherwise changed,
I suggest that the first clause, "The publisher intends this Report to
belong to the entire Haskell community, ..." be deleted.
Maybe the word "belong" could be replaced with "be available", but that
doesn't seem completely
