On 2004-06-14 at 15:59PDT "Iavor S. Diatchki" wrote:
> according to the report there should be no connection
> between modules and files, and one should be able to have
> multiple modules in a file, and even a single module in
> multiple files. however none of the implementations
> support that, s
Jon Fairbairn wrote:
On 2004-06-14 at 15:59PDT "Iavor S. Diatchki" wrote:
according to the report there should be no connection
between modules and files, and one should be able to have
multiple modules in a file, and even a single module in
multiple files. however none of the implementations
supp
On 07 June 2004 22:59, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> When you forkIO and one of the threads blocks
> (e.g. on a socket or a readchan), do execution
> automatically resume on other threads and does the
> blocked thread consume timeslices while it is
> blocked?
In GHC: yes, no.
> In other words,
The EuroHaskell 2004 Conference was great fun.
Shae Erisson gave a Haskell tutorial, Jeremy Bobbio gave a talk about hOp,
and John Hughes gave a talk/tutorial about Arrows.
Code was written, pizza was purchased, most attendees claimed to enjoy
themselves. A social event for programmers may be
I'd like a function that blocks until data is
available on one of two channels and then returns
that data wrapped in an Either. Here is my naive
implementation:
readEitherChan::Chan a -> Chan b -> Either a b
readEitherChan a b =
do
var <- newEmptyMVar
forkIO (readChan
G'day all.
Quoting Jerzy Karczmarczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Question of perspective... In Pascal, Modula, Python, Clean,
> you name it, modules and files were always 1 - 1.
A C++ class is basically an instantiable module. In C++, you can
implement more than one module in a file, and you can im
