On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:30:22AM +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> Actually GHC does exactly that when you compile with -prof -auto-all.
> Then if you run with +RTS -xc, you get a backtrace of sorts. (I have
> not tested this recently!) The backtrace is not yet reified into a data
> structure
Hi Geoff,
you have hit a weak point there ;-)
You cannot yet specify packages in the Eclipse plugin. It will be possible
in the next release, though, which will allow to specify additional options
that are passed to the compiler. I hope to get that version (0.5) out at the
end of October.
Meanwh
Howdy,
This list says that rank amateurs can post here. One has arrived :-!
I am just getting going with Haskell and Eclipse both, and cannot
figure out how to include a package with Eclipse. I am on Win2kPro
using GHC 6.2.1, wxHaskell 0.8, and Eclipse 3.0.1. Since I have just
recently downloa
On 04-Oct-2004, Jon Cast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> held forth:
> > If analyzing the performance and space usage of your programs is
> > important, then Haskell may not be the best choice of language.
>
> I disagree. If performance and space usage are suffic
W M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suppose in my ODE
> example it's building up expressions somewhere for
> lazy evaluation,
Exactly right. The trick is spotting which expressions. Until you
have some experience of likely causes, rather than guessing I can
recomme
Hi, I'm starting to learn haskell, and I was
considering it for a simulation I've been designing,
but I ran into this problem with a simple numerical
calculation. The attached program is supposed to
solve a stiff differential equation, and you have to
use a very small stepsize and lots of steps to
Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> held forth:
> On 28-Sep-2004, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I'm investigating Haskell, it's occured to me that most of the
> > Haskell tutorials out there have omitted something that was quite
> > prominent in the OCaml material I had read: maki
--- John Goerzen mumbled on 2004-09-29 20.29.47 + ---
> The next thing that occured to me is that, unlike OCaml and Python
> classes, Haskell has no mutable variables. A call like
> config.setOption("main", "initpath", "/usr") in Python -- which alters
> the state of the config object and retu
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've worked with languages with object-oriented features for awhile
> now. Python and OCaml, the two with which I work the most, both have
> OO.
>
> One of my first projects in Haskell would be to write a Haskell
> version of Python's ConfigParser[1] cl
On 28-Sep-2004, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I'm investigating Haskell, it's occured to me that most of the
> Haskell tutorials out there have omitted something that was quite
> prominent in the OCaml material I had read: making functions properly
> tail-recursive.
>
> The OCaml co
I was recently passed this reference, which I thought was worthy of sharing
here...
I've not yet read it myself in detail, but at a glance it looks very readable.
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~bcate/core/rwt.pdf
[[
Reasoning with Tableaux
Jan van Eijck
CWI and ILLC, Amsterdam, Uil-OTS, Utrecht
...
Actually GHC does exactly that when you compile with -prof -auto-all.
Then if you run with +RTS -xc, you get a backtrace of sorts. (I have
not tested this recently!) The backtrace is not yet reified into a data
structure that can be examined, but that'd be quite doable if someone
wanted to try.
12 matches
Mail list logo