Remi Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMO, [bracket] does indeed have those same drawbacks. (Although the
traditional explicit memory management model is alloc/free,
which is much worse than bracket/withFile)
Isn't bracket more like stack allocated memory? And most problems
with explicit
Cool! That goes on my list for further study.
(I have a work-in-progress of something similar for description logics.)
#g
--
At 15:01 22/10/04 -0700, Brian Beckman wrote:
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
On 24 October 2004 20:51, Sven Panne wrote:
IMHO it would be best to use explicit bracketing where possible, and
hope for the RTS/GC to try its best when one runs out of a given
resource. Admittedly the current Haskell implementations could be
improved a little bit in the last respect.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:46:41AM +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
Remi Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMO, [bracket] does indeed have those same drawbacks. (Although the
traditional explicit memory management model is alloc/free,
which is much worse than bracket/withFile)
Isn't bracket more
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:14:28PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 24 October 2004 20:51, Sven Panne wrote:
IMHO it would be best to use explicit bracketing where possible, and
hope for the RTS/GC to try its best when one runs out of a given
resource. Admittedly the current Haskell
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:55:46PM +0200, Remi Turk wrote:
P.S. Why do so many people (including me) seem to come to Haskell
from Python? It can't be just the indentation, can it? ;)
How many? I don't.
Best regards,
Tom
--
.signature: Too many levels of symbolic links
Remi Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hm, I'm not sure about the should. Garbage collection is meant
for memory, and anything making that less clear makes people
more likely to depend on incorrect assumptions.
And redefining GC to be a collection of _all_ garbage, instead of
just memory
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 09:28:23PM +0200, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 08:55:46PM +0200, Remi Turk wrote:
P.S. Why do so many people (including me) seem to come to Haskell
from Python? It can't be just the indentation, can it? ;)
How many? I don't.
Best regards,
Tomasz Zielonka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.S. Why do so many people (including me) seem to come to Haskell
from Python? It can't be just the indentation, can it? ;)
How many? I don't.
And I don't either.
But indeed I've seen more references to Haskell on Python lists than
on other
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk writes:
I would not be surprised if relying on GC to close open files would
be generally considered kosher in a few years - in cases when it has
little visible effects outside, i.e. excluding network connections,
but including reading configuration files.
One of the
From: David Menendez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Are handles garbage-collected?
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:51:34 -0400
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk writes:
I would not be surprised if relying on GC to close open files would
be generally considered kosher in a few years - in
11 matches
Mail list logo