Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
"Iavor S. Diatchki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I find the argument a bit disturbing, as it seems to imply that it
is OK for the compiler to produce code without any context switches
at all
Note that in this case if the main program doesn't explicitly block
"Iavor S. Diatchki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I find the argument a bit disturbing, as it seems to imply that it
> is OK for the compiler to produce code without any context switches
> at all
Note that in this case if the main program doesn't explicitly block
on MVars, I/O nor timeout, then f
On 2004-11-17, Vincenzo Ciancia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 November 2004 10:37, Henning Thielemann wrote:
>> Variable length argument lists are really a mess. Why are people so
>> keen on them? What is the advantage over a plain list as single
>> argument? Is vsprintf "%s, your age
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 November 2004 10:37, Henning Thielemann wrote:
> > Variable length argument lists are really a mess. Why are people so
> > keen on them? What is the advantage over a plain list as single
> > argument? Is vsprintf "%s, your age is %s\n"
Scott Turner wrote:
On 2004 November 16 Tuesday 06:42, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
There is a probleme with ShowS though: it is not internationalizable at
all. Strings like printf's or with any kind of variable substitution is
required for proper internationalization / localization.
Printf is no
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 10:37, Henning Thielemann wrote:
> Variable length argument lists are really a mess. Why are people so
> keen on them? What is the advantage over a plain list as single
> argument? Is vsprintf "%s, your age is %s\n" ["John", show
> (10::Integer)] really too complicated?
