However, I want to know if there has been any practical
standardisation in the GUI area. Last time I looked at this it seemed
some decisions had been made (bind to existing api - wxWindows?). I
am waiting for some real standardisation and a mature API before I
jump ship from Java for my
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 11:44:49AM +0100, Arjan van IJzendoorn wrote:
wxHaskell is available at http://www.wxhaskell.sfnet.org/
It runs on Windows, Linux and MacOS X. It has many GUI controls,
database access, is well documented and perfectly stable. We use this
toolkit for a Bayesian
It seems a bit of a stretch to call wxhaskell perfectly stable, when it
seems that the API changes with each release... It's definitely a
working
interface, but I wouldn't really call it a stable one. I guess it is
stable in the sense that it doesn't crash.
Yes, you are right. I meant the latter
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know this question is probably going over old ground - so I apologise
in advance.
However, I want to know if there has been any practical standardisation
in the GUI area. Last time I looked at this it seemed some
