Daniel Fischer wrote:
If the algorithm - including dt - is prescribed, fine, but I wonder what sort
of deviation physicists would consider acceptable.
For dt = 0.01, k = 2000 we have a relative error of about 2*10^(-5), is that
within accepted bounds or not? (Any physicists hang about here?)
At 13:08 07/05/05 -0400, David Roundy wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 12:40:55PM -0400, Daniel Carrera wrote:
In your opinion, do you think Haskell is appropriate for someone with
zero math background? I can't imagine how I'd explain something like
currying to someone who doesn't know math.
I'd
On May 9, 2005, at 8:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all.
Quoting Bo Herlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Great, why not put these together in a first attempt of making a
standard library?
As promised, here's the first attempt:
darcs get http://andrew.bromage.org/darcs/numbertheory/
How about
G'day all.
Quoting Jan-Willem Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How about one that's actually H98? The types here aren't *that*
fiddly... :-)
Well, part of what I was doing was experimenting with what a library like
this should look like, even more than what it should do. For some reason,
I kind
