G'day all.
Quoting Graham Klyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think you raise an important point. Reading this, I realize that I have
> no principled basis for deciding what makes a good API, in any language.
Me neither. Though I have short reading list.
First off, this series of articles by Ken A
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Jens Blanck wrote:
> > > How would I introduce number classes that are extended with plus and
> > > minus infinity? I'd like to have polymorphism over these new classes,
> > > something like a signature
> > >
> > > f :: (Real a, Extended a b) => b -> b
> >
I'm trying to download a darcs client, but I get:
"The connection was refused when trying to connect to www.haskell.org"
from Firefox on Linux.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.o
Hello,
There is also Hal Daume III's port of Binary from nhc98 which has some
bit-fiddling features:
http://www.n-heptane.com/nhlab/
Not sure if it is better than any of the other suggestions, but I
thought I would mention it just in case.
(note: the debian directory in there is unofficial for
Bjorn Lisper wrote:
Hi all,
Finally I found some time to reply to this posting. A couple of years ago we
did something called "Data Field Haskell", which is Haskell extended with a
generalized form of arrays called data fields. Much of the purpose was to
investigate convenient and general syntax fo
> I think you raise an important point. Reading this, I realize that I have
> no principled basis for deciding what makes a good API, in any language. I
> do, of course, have lots of personal ideas and feelings about what APIs
> should be like, but not that I could defend as coherent and ratio
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Bjorn Lisper wrote:
forall (i,j) -> i + j, a Vandermonde matrix
This does not look like a Vandermonde
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/VandermondeMatrix.html
If you take reciprocals you obtain almost a Hilbert matrix.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HilbertMatrix.html
__
Hi all,
Finally I found some time to reply to this posting. A couple of years ago we
did something called "Data Field Haskell", which is Haskell extended with a
generalized form of arrays called data fields. Much of the purpose was to
investigate convenient and general syntax for array constructio
At 21:42 15/05/05 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Continuing on from the previous thought, part of the problem here is that
we teach people to write code (e.g. how to implement a sort), but we don't
teach people to write APIs. APIs are both trickier to get right AND are
more important in larger pr
Hello Florian,
Wednesday, May 18, 2005, 12:44:14 AM, you wrote:
FW> I'm toying a bit with Haskell and wondering what's the best way to
FW> implement bit fiddling. Most of my applications involve serializing
FW> and deserializing small blobs (IP packets, for instance), and after
FW> browsing the
10 matches
Mail list logo