On 10/12/05, John Meacham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I certainly think we should somehow centralize an index to papers onhaskell. I have found it extremely difficult to track down papers forauthors that have since moved out of academia or have passed on anddon't have their personal homepages with t
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:53:01PM +0200, Nils Anders Danielsson wrote:
> Most authors do put their papers on their web pages nowadays.
>
> On a side note, it is a little strange that the research community
> does the research, writes and typesets the papers, and does most (?)
> of the arrangement
Hi Young,
Just to give a somewhat different perspective, sometimes increasing
laziness is helpful for avoiding space problems--not really so much space
"leaks" as space wastage.
In this case, you probably can't afford to hold "contents" in memory at any
given time. So you need to be certain both
Young Hyun wrote:
> Here's what the program does. It reads a binary file containing a
> large number of varying-length structured records. [...]
>
> Unless I'm badly mistaken, nothing about fixArts suggests that it
> would leak memory. So, it would appear parseArts is somehow to blame
> f
On 11 October 2005 07:34, Young Hyun wrote:
> What intuition should be my guide about the "proper way" of employing
> lazy evaluation? It's not yet clear to me what you mean by "the
> system needs to hang onto all the input data ...". It seems
> counterintuitive for the evaluator to hang onto pa
