Hi.. I've found the nice documentation about building ghc on
haskell.org/ghc -> documentation.
There is one chapter (#1) about C compilers and environments to use:
Either MSYS or cywin and
gcc of MinGW because gcc of cygwin will link to cygwin1.dll by default
which may change and therefore can b
So... I see no reason why someone can't just do it themselves, but...
I was playing around with Parsec (as included in GHC 6.4.1), and I found
two functions that are... not quite what I believe they should be.
optional :: GenParser tok st a -> GenParser tok st ()
optional p = do{ p;
> "Neil" == Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Neil> Hi, I don't know of any, but there may well be, I've never
Neil> looked.
Neil> It probably wouldn't be that difficult to do, since XSLT is
Neil> a functional language. There is probably lots of code in
Neil> HaXml
Hi,
I don't know of any, but there may well be, I've never looked.
It probably wouldn't be that difficult to do, since XSLT is a
functional language. There is probably lots of code in HaXml you could
reuse (since the syntax for XSLT is XML). The only slightly taxing
thing would be that XSLT is no
Has anyone written a pure haskell xslt interpreter? If not, how
difficult would it be to do so?
-Alex-
__
S. Alexander Jacobson tel:917-770-6565 http://alexjacobson.com
___
Haskell-Cafe m
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
Saturday, February 11, 2006, 3:17:12 PM, you wrote:
each and every monadic operation is a function!
WJ> What do you mean with "monadic operatation"? (>>=), (>>) and return are, of
WJ> course, functions but an I/O action like getChar is *not* a functio
Hello Wolfgang,
Saturday, February 11, 2006, 3:17:12 PM, you wrote:
>> each and every monadic operation is a function!
WJ> What do you mean with "monadic operatation"? (>>=), (>>) and return are,
of
WJ> course, functions but an I/O action like getChar is *not* a function. Also
a
WJ> list i
On Saturday 11 Feb 2006 1:09 pm, Jon Fairbairn wrote:
> On 2006-02-11 at 12:25GMT Dominic Steinitz wrote:
> > I've quickly put this together to measure frequencies of pairs of letters
> > (e.g. 1st and 2nd) in words. It works fine on a small test data sets but
> > I have a feeling that it will perf
On 2006-02-11 at 12:25GMT Dominic Steinitz wrote:
> I've quickly put this together to measure frequencies of pairs of letters
> (e.g. 1st and 2nd) in words. It works fine on a small test data sets but I
> have a feeling that it will perform poorly as it spends a lot of time
> updating a 26*26 ar
I've quickly put this together to measure frequencies of pairs of letters
(e.g. 1st and 2nd) in words. It works fine on a small test data sets but I
have a feeling that it will perform poorly as it spends a lot of time
updating a 26*26 array. Before I throw a dictionary at it, does anyone have
Am Sonntag, 5. Februar 2006 17:36 schrieb Bulat Ziganshin:
> [...]
> each and every monadic operation is a function!
What do you mean with "monadic operatation"? (>>=), (>>) and return are, of
course, functions but an I/O action like getChar is *not* a function. Also a
list is not a function
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 02:58:50PM +0100, Marc Weber wrote:
> > echo "Press Ctrl-d when finished or enter exit to continue this script"
> > bash dozip afterConfiguring
> I did make a small mistake here:
> it should look like this:
> bash
> dozip afterConfiguring
>
> Oh.. and I
Mark T.B. Carroll wrote:
Creighton Hogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
data Patootie = Pa Int | Tootie Int
and I want to pull out the indices of all elements of a list
that have type constructor Tootie, how would I do that?
x = [Pa 3, Tootie 5, Pa 7, Tootie 9, Pa 11]
y = [ i |Tootie i <- x
13 matches
Mail list logo