On 14/11/2006, at 3:29 AM, Valentin Gjorgjioski wrote:
On 13.11.2006 16:54 Valentin Gjorgjioski wrote:
On 13.11.2006 16:48 Pepe Iborra wrote:
Hi Valentin
Please, take a look at the Haskell Wiki page for debugging.
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Debugging
You will find that thanks to Neil M
Please do not use the PLEAC Haskell cookbook for learning Haskell.
The author redefined many of the standard operators to produce code
that isn't standard Haskell.
Here are some choice snippets from the first chapter:
Now, we all know that the (.) operator is function composition,
right?
it would be great if some of the more informed posters here took a stab
at filling in
http://pleac.sourceforge.net/pleac_haskell/index.html
a neat site for cookbook-style problem solving
from looking over haskell documentation for a few months now, i would
say what is missing is one central coo
as RedHat and RPMs is widely used for packaging software available via
internet. Is Ubuntu supports RPMs too?
I think it's widely regarded as a Bad Idea to mix packages between
distributions.
I would suggest Ubuntu (or Debian Sid if you are interested in getting
newer versions of GHC). I th
gtk-demo seemed to run fine.
--Ben
On 13 Nov 2006, at 21:01, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 20:49 +, Ben Moseley wrote:
Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
I'm not sure actually. I seem to recall someone trying it but I can't
remember who now.
cc
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 20:49 +, Ben Moseley wrote:
> Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
I'm not sure actually. I seem to recall someone trying it but I can't
remember who now.
cc-ing to gtk2hs-users in case anyone knows: has anyone on OSX tried the
new Gtk+ 2.10.x
Has anyone succeeded in getting it running on OSX/intel at all?
...I had a brief go a few weeks back, managed to get the Cairo Clock
running, but anything that used GTK seemed to blow up instantly. (OSX/
ppc was fine).
--Ben
On 13 Nov 2006, at 19:03, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-1
[reposted with improved subject]
I notice that the Socket returned by ghc Network.Socket (socket) has
been set non-blocking. (Noticed empirically, not from documentation.)
The Network.Socket functions that use it, e.g., recv, are ready for
that, of course, but as a general rule, external functio
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 10:19:16 PM, you wrote:
>> >> why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
>> it will be great to see comments about this. it's impossible to write
>> my program without using threaded RTS
> As for the threaded RTS, currently that's only ok if
I notice that the Socket returned by ghc Network.Socket (socket) has
been set non-blocking. (Noticed empirically, not from documentation.)
The Network.Socket functions that use it, e.g., recv, are ready for
that, of course, but as a general rule, external functions that
expect a socket are very l
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 17:10 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> >> > The one thing you should be aware of is that Windows + Threading +
> >> > Gtk2Hs + Gtk + GHC = Pain.
> >>
> >> why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
>
> > I think so, yes. Or there are bizare -threaded restrictions
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 18:00 +, Tim Docker wrote:
> > afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
> > anyone point (or write) detailed comparison of their features?
>
> One point in wxHaskell's favour is that it supports Mac OS X directly. At
> present, to the best of
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 16:48 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> Hello Duncan,
>
> Monday, November 13, 2006, 4:10:03 PM, you wrote:
>
> on the download page only GHC 6.4.1 support mentioned. is 6.4.2 and
> 6.6 supported on windows?
The last official release for Windows supports GHC 6.2.2 and 6.4.1.
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> third: are there any "appetizers" demonstrating features of each
> library and with source code available for studying? except for
> memory.pdf which don't mention where full source can be downloaded
>
> it will be interesting to see sources of more "business-like"
> applic
Iván Pérez Domínguez wrote:
> Neil Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Hi Bulat,
>>
>>
>>> afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
>>> anyone point (or write) detailed comparison of their features? i plan
>>> to write large GUI program in Haskell and want to select best one.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 13:36:13 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
>Hello Ketil,
>
>Monday, November 13, 2006, 10:45:59 AM, you wrote:
>
My friend offered me 3 variants: SuSe, Fedora Core 5, free variant of
RedHat (i can't remember its name, may be Ubuntu?)
>> CentOS, perhaps? It is usually
> afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
> anyone point (or write) detailed comparison of their features?
One point in wxHaskell's favour is that it supports Mac OS X directly. At
present, to the best of my knowledge, you can only run GtkHs applications
on OS X usin
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Montag, den 13.11.2006, 21:24 +1100 schrieb John Ky:
> > I have modules that don't export some functions. Is there a way I can
> > access them from ghci without exporting them?
>
> It seems that if there are .hi files around, ghci can't reach th
Alex Queiroz wrote:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> On 11/13/06, Mark T.B. Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> How up to date will Debian unstable's GHC be kept, though? It seems
>>> pretty good at the moment, but there have been times when we've had to
>>> install from source instead of via Debian earl
Can you manage to compile GHC under Windows? Compiling GHC under
Windows is known to be a bit tricky and time consuming, certainly not
for the novice user, although the steps are well detailed in the GHC
developer documentation.
If so, I'd encourage you to play with the Ghci Debugger projec
On 11/13/06, Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Neil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 5:06:02 PM, you wrote:
> http://haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-0.9.10.exe
> That's the most recent Gtk2Hs for 6.4.2.
the http://haskell.org/gtk2hs/download/ page says that gtk2hs is
available onl
On 13.11.2006 16:54 Valentin Gjorgjioski wrote:
On 13.11.2006 16:48 Pepe Iborra wrote:
Hi Valentin
Please, take a look at the Haskell Wiki page for debugging.
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Debugging
You will find that thanks to Neil Mitchell there is a Windows version
of Hat available. Perh
On 13.11.2006 16:48 Pepe Iborra wrote:
Hi Valentin
Please, take a look at the Haskell Wiki page for debugging.
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Debugging
You will find that thanks to Neil Mitchell there is a Windows version
of Hat available. Perhaps you can add your experiences with it if it
w
Hallo,
On 11/13/06, Mark T.B. Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How up to date will Debian unstable's GHC be kept, though? It seems
pretty good at the moment, but there have been times when we've had to
install from source instead of via Debian earlier this year so that we
had GHC features and
Max Vasin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but I wouldn't recommend installing rpms in debian-based system
> (although, it can work perfectly). GHC 6.6 is in Debian unstable
> (and should be in Ubuntu 6.10 or development branch). Ubuntu universe
> repositiry is automatically updated from Debian
Hi Valentin
Please, take a look at the Haskell Wiki page for debugging.
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Debugging
You will find that thanks to Neil Mitchell there is a Windows version
of Hat available. Perhaps you can add your experiences with it if it
works for you.
pepe
On 13/11/2006, a
I'm pretty new in Haskell, few days since I started learning it. I want
to debu my programs. I'm currently using WinHugs, and I prefer debugger
for this.
I tried googling and I found Hugs.Observer.
I like it how it works, but still I have one BIG problem with it. It
doesn't work well with flo
I think Haskell packages from sid can be installed on etch with no harm
(or problem). All you need is to configure apt to use both testing and
unstable.
--
WBR, Max Vasin.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/ma
On linux you should use your package manager (whenever possible), not binaries
from the site (or compile it yourself).
--
WBR,
Max Vasin.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Yes, but I wouldn't recommend installing rpms in debian-based system
(although, it can work perfectly). GHC 6.6 is in Debian unstable
(and should be in Ubuntu 6.10 or development branch). Ubuntu universe
repositiry is automatically updated from Debian repos thus being
one of the largest repos for L
Bulat Ziganshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> of remaining, Ubuntu has widest support here while SuSe is favourite
> of my friend. one thing that i like in suse is that it uses the same
> RPMs as RedHat and RPMs is widely used for packaging software
> available via internet. Is Ubuntu supports RPM
Hello Neil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 5:06:02 PM, you wrote:
> http://haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-0.9.10.exe
> That's the most recent Gtk2Hs for 6.4.2.
the http://haskell.org/gtk2hs/download/ page says that gtk2hs is
available only for 6.4.1
>> > The one thing you should be aware of is
Hi Bulat,
http://haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-0.9.10.exe
That's the most recent Gtk2Hs for 6.4.2.
> The one thing you should be aware of is that Windows + Threading +
> Gtk2Hs + Gtk + GHC = Pain.
why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
I think so, yes. Or there are biza
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006, David House wrote:
> On 11/11/06, Aditya Siram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > subOne :: [Integer] -> [Integer]
> > subOne = map (- 1)
>
> The short answer is that this is interpreted as negative unity, rather
> than a section of binary minus. There are two common workarounds
Hello Neil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 4:43:59 PM, you wrote:
> The full source code of GuiHaskell is available.
i will at it too
> The one thing you should be aware of is that Windows + Threading +
> Gtk2Hs + Gtk + GHC = Pain.
why? are you tried to call Gtk2Hs from only one thread?
--
Best
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 4:10:03 PM, you wrote:
on the download page only GHC 6.4.1 support mentioned. is 6.4.2 and
6.6 supported on windows? on linux? where i can read about forthcoming
gtk2hs version and when it will be released?
--
Best regards,
Bulat
Cale Gibbard wrote:
On 22/10/06, Chad Scherrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I had posted this question a while back, but I think it was in the
middle of another discussion, and I never did get a reply. Do we
really need both Control.Parallel.Strategies.rnf and deepSeq? Should
we not always ha
Hi
- Gtk2Hs had better support, but now wxHaskell has more maintainers and
situation may change to opposite in a next few months
As long as Duncan is around, there will always be enough Gtk2Hs
support! Currently Gtk2Hs _has_ better support, the situation may
change or may not. Remember that Du
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 15:41 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> Hello Duncan,
>
> Monday, November 13, 2006, 3:36:32 AM, you wrote:
>
> >> afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
>
> in brief, i see the following main differences:
>
> - wxHaskell is easier to understan
Hi,
Am Montag, den 13.11.2006, 21:24 +1100 schrieb John Ky:
> I have modules that don't export some functions. Is there a way I can
> access them from ghci without exporting them?
It seems that if there are .hi files around, ghci can’t reach the
non-exported functions, but if you delete this fil
Hello Duncan,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 3:36:32 AM, you wrote:
>> afaik, there are just two good enough libs - wxHaskell and GtkHs. can
in brief, i see the following main differences:
- wxHaskell is easier to understand and to use, Ght2Hs allows to use
Glade to develop "look&feel"
- Gtk2Hs ha
tpledger:
> Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> [...]
> > While we're here we should fix:
> > chameneos
> > And anything else you want to take a
> > look at.
> >
> > A community page has been set up to
> > which you can submit improved entries:
> >
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Great_languag
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
[...]
> While we're here we should fix:
> chameneos
> And anything else you want to take a
> look at.
>
> A community page has been set up to
> which you can submit improved entries:
>
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Great_language_shootout
[...]
Well, then!
Hello Ketil,
Monday, November 13, 2006, 10:45:59 AM, you wrote:
>>> My friend offered me 3 variants: SuSe, Fedora Core 5, free variant of
>>> RedHat (i can't remember its name, may be Ubuntu?)
> CentOS, perhaps? It is usually good advice to choose whatever your
> friends are using,
thanks to e
Hello,I have modules that don't export some functions. Is there a way I can access them from ghci without exporting them?Thanks-John
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
45 matches
Mail list logo
