ahhh ... makes perfect sense vis-a-vis the read/write problem Jeremy.
Hopefully using an incremented version number is enforced via the hackage
database!! ;^)
Vasili
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Jeremy Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:29:40 -0500,
Galchin, Vasili
This is an interesting thought. Has there been any work towards
collecting
properties written with QuickCheck (or similar) into a reusable chunk of
some form?
Yes, it's in development, called 'checkers'. code.haskell.org/checkers
Great! I especially like the Char generators. This would
Christopher Lane Hinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having a debianized cabal-install would be the biggest win in my book. If
there were an unofficial debianized mirror of hackage, I probably wouldn't
use it anyway.
I might. I generally want to use newer versions of development stuff
(i.e.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no. Debian packages are expected to have active
magnus:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
be a bit of a no-no. Debian packages are expected to have
Hi
1) I want to upload a version with minor changes. Should I send out an
announcement?
How minor are the changes? I tend to annouce no more than once every
few months for a package, and when its popular or has new features
people might be interested in
(I am assuming this is a package
Ketil Malde wrote:
Christopher Lane Hinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having a debianized cabal-install would be the biggest win in my book. If
there were an unofficial debianized mirror of hackage, I probably wouldn't
use it anyway.
I might.
I would. (I run Ubuntu at home, Debian on my
Hi, all -
I'm proud to report that John, Don and I have finished the draft
manuscript of our book. It is now available online in its entirety.
For more details, see here:
http://www.realworldhaskell.org/blog/2008/08/22/our-writing-is-now-complete/
We expect the final book to be published
Hello Bryan,
Friday, August 22, 2008, 10:10:19 PM, you wrote:
I'm proud to report that John, Don and I have finished the draft
manuscript of our book. It is now available online in its entirety.
many thanks! the book is huge step toward in spreading Haskell to rule
the world :)
--
Best
Hello All,
I'm proud to announce the first monad tutorial of the new season. It's
under the Wiki permissive licence, but the web page has some clip art,
so 'The Greenhorn's Guide to becoming a Monad Cowboy' is on
http://www.muitovar.com/monad/moncow.xhtml
Best Regards,
Hans van Thiel
Are the book's sample code available for download?
Thanks
Daryoush
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Bryan,
Friday, August 22, 2008, 10:10:19 PM, you wrote:
I'm proud to report that John, Don and I have finished the draft
manuscript of our
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 22.08.2008, 10:13 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to debian would
nomeata:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 22.08.2008, 10:13 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 2:32 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:52:00 -0400 (EDT),
Christopher Lane Hinson wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think uploading ~500 hackage packages to
Hello,
With pure side of the Haskell house, there is hope that the generated
code could automagically scale as more cores are added yes? It seems that it
is on the stateful monadic side of the house in an appplication that it is
the programmer responsibility to design the software so that
Hi
across increasing cores? (I am assuming that things like par construct are
monadic).
http://haskell.org/hoogle/?q=par
Control.Parallelpar :: a - b - b
No monads :-)
Thanks
Neil
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Henning Thielemann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day all.
Quoting Bjorn Buckwalter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd store the constants in a data structure along the lines of:
data AstroData a = AstroData
{ mu_Earth
16 matches
Mail list logo