Done! Thanks for the suggestion. - Conal
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you add this info/link to the upgrading page?
>
>http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Upgrading_packages#Arrow_instances>,
>
> Using social/community processes to paralleli
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:25:25PM -0500, Stephen Hicks wrote:
>
> I was noticing recently that there seems to be a problem with Hoogle
> and Haddock. In particular, I just hoogled "bracket" and got the
> following result:
> bracket :: IO a -> a -> IO b -> a -> IO c -> IO c
> Clearly this is
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:48:47PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > yeah, but then we have the odd case of things like frisby 0.9.0 and
> > 0.9.0.1 both floating about, where the second is actually just the
> > cabalized version of the first, and not an actual version. it gets even
> > more complica
Here we go again. App finally linked, but then I get this error:
jeff-heards-macbook:IlluminateGL jeff$ ./Illuminate
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _glXQueryExtension
Referenced from: /opt/local/lib/libgdkglext-x11-1.0.0.dylib
Expected in: flat namespace
dyld: Symbol not
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Mauricio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (...) But the major advantage of hsc2hs is that if your C
>> struct changes or you use a different C compiler, the allignment
>> and size as well as the offsets used in peek and poke will still
>> be correct since the c
Hi,
I was noticing recently that there seems to be a problem with Hoogle
and Haddock. In particular, I just hoogled "bracket" and got the
following result:
bracket :: IO a -> a -> IO b -> a -> IO c -> IO c
Clearly this is the wrong type, as it should be
bracket :: IO a -> (a -> IO
Building my app with gtk2hs, I get the following error when I try to
compile a file that uses Template Haskell (I'm not using TH to do
anythign with GTK, but it loads the package anyway)
Loading package gtk-0.9.13 ... : can't load .so/.DLL
for: gthread-2.0 (dlopen(libgthread-2.0.dylib, 10): image
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 05:56 -0800, John Meacham wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:56:31PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 04:06 -0800, John Meacham wrote:
> > > Well, my main concern is that I have projects that have several
> > > distribution formats, tarball, rpm, deb, and
lionel:
> AFAIK, there are two public on this haskell reddit : haskeller and
> curious about haskelle (evolving pythonneers ?).
Yes, I agree with that assessment. It is a way to interact with the
"Haskell-curious".
> So anything goes.
>
> (Don : you post a lot. Is that part of your morning ro
David Waern wrote:
2008/11/6 Wolfgang Jeltsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Donnerstag, 6. November 2008 00:21 schrieb David Waern:
* Add framed view of the HTML documentation
After many years with many people telling us that frames are bad, you add
frame support to Haddock? Hmm.
You should dis
> (...) But the major advantage of hsc2hs is that if your C
> struct changes or you use a different C compiler, the allignment
> and size as well as the offsets used in peek and poke will still
> be correct since the compiler will calculate it for you. (...)
>
> And you wanted to write a
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Mauricio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you are using hsc2hs (if you are using Cabal this is easy; just
>> rename the file to *.hsc and Cabal will take care of the rest), then
>> there is a macro for making this easier and so you don't have to think
>> about it. (
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:56:31PM +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 04:06 -0800, John Meacham wrote:
> > Well, my main concern is that I have projects that have several
> > distribution formats, tarball, rpm, deb, and hopefully hackage
> > (alongside the others as equals). I don'
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 04:06 -0800, John Meacham wrote:
> Well, my main concern is that I have projects that have several
> distribution formats, tarball, rpm, deb, and hopefully hackage
> (alongside the others as equals). I don't want the version numbers to
> get out of sync though, just because I
Well, my main concern is that I have projects that have several
distribution formats, tarball, rpm, deb, and hopefully hackage
(alongside the others as equals). I don't want the version numbers to
get out of sync though, just because I have to reroll the hackage, or
rpm, or whatever release, I don'
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 11:03 +, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:28 +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > > The cabal user guide lists the default install directories for global
> > > and user installs.
> >
> > Okay, I looked at the cabal-install docs. And the only doc seems to be
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 02:15 -0800, Jason Dusek wrote:
> Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jason Dusek wrote:
> > > In the ticket, someone says:
> > >
> > > True though I suspect it looks a bit weird to the
> > > uninitiated. We know to read the conditional syntax as an
> > > implicati
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:28 +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. November 2008 22:24 schrieben Sie:
> > > > How do I install and configure it so that it is integrated best with
> > > > GHC 6.10.1? For example, should cabal use some directory in the GHC
> > > > tree to place compiled p
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 10:41 +1300, Daniel McAllansmith wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:27:36 Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > It's even easier than that! Someone has done it already :-)
> >
> > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/261
> >
> > Thu Aug 28 16:55:16 CEST 2008 Chry Cheng <[EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 20:25 -0800, John Meacham wrote:
> The usual solution to this is the 'release version', which is used in
> most (all?) other packaging systems. namely, you have foo-1.2-4, where 4 is
> the
> release version which documents what version the meta-info is. For
> instance, when b
AFAIK, there are two public on this haskell reddit : haskeller and
curious about haskelle (evolving pythonneers ?).
So anything goes.
(Don : you post a lot. Is that part of your morning routine ?)
L.
Don Stewart wrote:
I'm not sure if the cafe@ knows this, but there's a bit of a Haskell
comm
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Benjamin L.Russell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I missing something, or has the nickname been changed?
Well, 'ghc --version' tells me that I am using "The Glorious Glasgow
Haskell Compilation System, version 6.10.1"...
___
22 matches
Mail list logo
