Call for Talks and Tutorials
ACM SIGPLAN 2009 Developer Tracks on Functional Programming
http://www.defun2009.info/
Edinburgh, Scotland, September 3 and 5, 2009
The workshop will be held in conjunction with ICFP 2009
http:/
michael rice wrote:
Still exploring monads. I don't understand why the type signature for double is
OK,
It isn't. The |a| and |b| variables must unify:
Prelude> :t \x -> Just (x+x)
\x -> Just (x+x) :: (Num a) => a -> Maybe a
Prelude> :t (\x -> Just (x+x)) :: Num a => a -> Maybe b
Thanks for bringing in this angle, David.
My preference is for honest and humble practice and documentation of
negative design. Instead of saying that something "won't work", "can't
work", "is impossible" etc (or rephrased via "must", "only", etc), I'd like
honest admissions like "I couldn't figu
Yeah, I went back and tried double again, though I'd swear I got the dang thing
to compile (and run) w/o errors.
I guess I meant Num. So Num is a class and Int and Integer are types? What are
the other classes? Docs?
Unification, for me, is pattern matching ala Prolog. What's the meaning in
H
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 18:09 -0400, wren ng thornton wrote:
> GADTs can easily cover record selectors that apply to all constructors,
> and selectors that apply to one constructor (or a set of constructors
> producing the same type). If the family of selector sets forms a nice
> tree hierarchy, y
On Wed, 27 May 2009 15:04:36 -0700, Thomas DuBuisson
wrote:
>>> ?There are links to some great tutorials [1] and IRC
>>> information where you can get real-time help [2]. ?Also there are some
>>> good books [3].
>>>
>>> I think most "recent" learners learned from YAHT [4], Gentle
>>> Introduction
Hi Dan,
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I was learning to program in imperative languages like Java, there
> were plenty of resources to learn from about how to design large
> programs. Ideas like the GoF Design Patterns gave useful models that
> one could then scale
On Wed, 27 May 2009 17:52:17 -0300, Mauricio
wrote:
>I would like to create a mailing list for Portuguese speaking
>Haskell programmers. I tried checking haskell.org mailing lists
>page, but the only contact e-mail I see is 'mail...@haskell.org',
>and a message sent to that address is replied wit
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo