I am trying to understand darcs implementation. I can install the app using
cabal, so now I want to load it in ghci to be able to play around with it.
Any help on how to load the .h is greatly appreciated. I tried -i with
path to the src directory but it didn't work (should it?).
I am also v
> What am I doing wrong?
I don't know exactly. What's your use case? You should be able to load
the darcs library into ghci without problems. Maybe this is good enough
for you?
impossible.h is located in src. So looking up ghc flags about how to
to pass -I flags to CPP should be enough (?).
Anoth
On Feb 16, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
On 16 February 2010 14:45, Don Stewart wrote:
ivan.miljenovic:
On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
/me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the d
I wonder if I should use the GHC API to do this. I notice there is a
module called BinIface that contains a reader for interface files.
The trouble is you have to figure out how to initialize a program that
uses the module, and that seems to be difficult. I couldn't find
anything relevant on the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ivan Miljenovic
wrote:
> On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
>> Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
>
> /me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
> not the first year of a new decade...
Hm, I'm
On 16 February 2010 14:45, Don Stewart wrote:
> ivan.miljenovic:
>> On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
>> > Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
>>
>> /me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
>> not the first year of a new dec
ivan.miljenovic:
> On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
> > Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
>
> /me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
> not the first year of a new decade...
Computer scientists count from zero. :-)
--
On 16 February 2010 08:35, Don Stewart wrote:
> Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
/me points out that 2010 is actually the last year of the decade, and
not the first year of a new decade...
;-)
--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.
On 16 February 2010 02:22, John D. Ramsdell wrote:
> I would like to find symbols exported from each module in a program
> that are not used outside the module. I'm worried my program is
> accumulating cruft. I'm looking for suggestions on how to find unused
> exported symbols. Do I have to ana
I am trying to load darc.hs (from darcs 2.3.1, ghci 6.10.4 on Ubuntu) and I
get the following
:~/darcs-src/darcs-2.3.1/src$ ghci
GHCi, version 6.10.4: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done.
Loading package integer ... linking ... done.
Loading packa
Hi everybody,
Here's the final report on our Darcs 2010 fundraising effort. In a
word, success! I wasn't sure we could pull it off, but thanks to all of
your contributions, we reached our target of $2000.
Thanks, everyone!
We'll be using this money to fund travel expenses for our bi-annual
Dar
gue.schmidt:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 15.01.10 02:00, schrieb Don Stewart:
>> gue.schmidt:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> are there any IDL compilers that can create Haskelk modules from header
>>> files or type-libs?
>>>
>>>
>> The venerable hdirect. http://www.haskell.org/hdirect/
>>
>> I've recently cabal
Miguel Mitrofanov schrieb:
-- {-# LANGUAGE FunctionalDependencies#-}
-- {-# LANGUAGE MultiParamTypeClasses #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
module Register where
-- class Register a r | a -> r
class Register a where
type R a
-- instance Register Int Int
instance Register Int where
type R
dan.doel:
> On Thursday 11 February 2010 8:54:15 pm Dan Doel wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 February 2010 12:43:10 pm stefan kersten wrote:
> > > On 10.02.10 19:03, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> > > > I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector.
> > >
> > > that would be even bett
creswick:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> > And I'll take this opportunity to declare that uvector is now in
> > official maintainance-only mode.
>
> Would it make sense to add a note to that effect to the package
> description / cabal file, so it shows up on hackage? ('
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> And I'll take this opportunity to declare that uvector is now in
> official maintainance-only mode.
Would it make sense to add a note to that effect to the package
description / cabal file, so it shows up on hackage? ('Stability:
Experimenta
Don Stewart wrote:
Enjoy the new decade of flexible, fusible, fast arrays for Haskell!
More interesting might be a post on how to migrate from Data.Array to
vector; it's news to me that any of these post-Haskell98 array libraries
are production-ready yet.
(And while we're on the subject,
I've summarised my notes on how to migrate array code from the uvector
package to Roman's vector package:
http://donsbot.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/migrating-from-uvector-to-vector/
And I'll take this opportunity to declare that uvector is now in
official maintainance-only mode.
Enjoy the new
Jason Dusek wrote:
I recently discovered that many haskell-cafe mails are
being dumped in my SPAM folder. A lot of them are from John
Lato and Simon Marlow.
I wonder if anyone else has experienced this?
My ISP classifies huge amounts of Haskell-related mail as spam - no
matter how
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Jason Dusek wrote:
> I recently discovered that many haskell-cafe mails are
> being dumped in my SPAM folder. A lot of them are from John
> Lato and Simon Marlow.
I just did this search on my Gmail: "in:spam haskell" ... and got no
results, so I think I'm okay
I recently discovered that many haskell-cafe mails are
being dumped in my SPAM folder. A lot of them are from John
Lato and Simon Marlow.
I wonder if anyone else has experienced this?
--
Jason Dusek
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@has
2010/02/15 Tom Tobin :
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Michael Lesniak
> wrote:
> > > There's the subReddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell_proposals/
> >
> > I know it. The problem is that (at least in my opinion) only a small
> > fraction of Haskell'ers use it.
>
> I strongly dislike "socia
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Michael Lesniak wrote:
>> There's the subReddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell_proposals/
> I know it. The problem is that (at least in my opinion) only a small
> fraction of Haskell'ers use it.
I strongly dislike "social X" sites (where X is "networking",
"book
Hmm... It looks like a useful tool to implement.
(Of course it does not make sense for libraries, only for executables)
It can be easily implemented using haskell-src-exts package.
2010/2/15 John D. Ramsdell :
> I would like to find symbols exported from each module in a program
> that are not use
I would like to find symbols exported from each module in a program
that are not used outside the module. I'm worried my program is
accumulating cruft. I'm looking for suggestions on how to find unused
exported symbols. Do I have to analyse .hi files? Thanks in advance.
John
__
Thank you very much,
What would be your recommendation on how to get a grasp of FoF - would the
tic-tac-toe sample help - could you share that please?
Regards,
Kashyap
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Pierre-Evariste Dagand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, C K Kashyap wrote:
wren ng thornton freegeek.org> writes:
> or whatever).
>
> Haskell and similar languages choose a particular set of coercions to
Nice explanation.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 02:33 +0100, Maciej Podgurski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install happstack via "cabal install happstack" on my WinXP
> system. While installation progress, my anti-virus software (Avira
> AntiVir) warned me about dll_hsc_make.exe and files_hsc_make.exe to be a
> Trojan ho
* On Sun, Feb 14 2010, Vojtěch Knyttl wrote:
> http://pastebin.dqd.cz/cUmg/
>
> 1. The problem is, that it is very slow. It is obvious that what takes
> the most time is the "mandel" function computation. I have no idea,
> how it can be improved.
Why 1000 iterations? Why is "Infinity" equal to 50
Hello,
> There's the subReddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell_proposals/
I know it. The problem is that (at least in my opinion) only a small
fraction of Haskell'ers use it. On the other hand, I have not found
anything on the Wiki regarding these things, so maybe it's better than
nothing.
Cheer
30 matches
Mail list logo
