Darrin Chandler dwchand...@stilyagin.com writes:
It's not obvious to me that adding a mirror makes the infrastructure
more more insecure. Any particular concerns? (I hope I qualify as
naïve here :-)
If you run a mirror people will come to you for software to run on their
machines. I see a
Hi,
Formerly, I had IORef and some state monad to do the task of keeping states.
Now in haskell 2010, I cannot find anything about it. Do I have to
use ghc base package for this function?
--
竹密岂妨流水过
山高哪阻野云飞
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
On 08/12/10 08:13, Ketil Malde wrote:
My apologies for not expressing myself more clearly. What I mean is
that currently, Hackage has a ton of users, each of whom may at whim
upload a new version of any library. It's not clear to me that security
is significantly worsened by adding a mirror.
Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org writes:
You have to start somewhere with security.
Yes. And you should start with assessing how much cost and
inconvenience you are willing to suffer for the improvement in
security you gain. In this case, my assertion is that the marginal
worsening of security
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:03:40 +0100, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Formerly, I had IORef and some state monad to do the task of keeping
states.
Now in haskell 2010, I cannot find anything about it. Do I have to
use ghc base package for this function?
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Henk-Jan van Tuyl hjgt...@chello.nl wrote:
the state monad is in both the mtl and the transformers
package (mtl is deprecated).
mtl is not deprecated. mtl-2 depends on transformers.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Off topic
I was deeply involved in genetic programming in the past (in fact I
discovered Haskell on looking for a functional language for genetic
programing with better syntax than LISP).
But I soon realized that GP was not the holy grial after all. The problem
with evolving arbitrary
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
But programs are non lineal.
And DNK is? I doubt. ;-)
I think the approach is valid, it simulates what is happening in
nature (random insertions, deletions, changes, translations, copies,
etc, without any higher
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Henning Thielemann
lemm...@henning-thielemann.de wrote:
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Lally Singh wrote:
Hey all,
I'm generating a structure definition from input, and would like to
generate some LLVM code that can use it. I see an 'alloca' function
in LLVM.Core
DNK? I think you mean DNA.
the genotype program that develips the fenotype is much more smooth and
granular than a computer program. A chante un a gen does not make you to
have a extra bone. It can make you to have your hand slighltly longer. or
shorter.
In fact there are metalevels of
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:41:31AM +0100, Ketil Malde wrote:
Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org writes:
You have to start somewhere with security.
Yes. And you should start with assessing how much cost and
inconvenience you are willing to suffer for the improvement in
security you gain. In
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
I'm a bit surprised to find that there seems to be a lot of opposition
to this view, but perhaps the existing structure is more secure than I
thought?
The difference is in the ability to influence other packages and
metadata, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/8/10 02:17 , Anders Kaseorg wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 13:42 -0500, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
We went over this some time back; the GHC runtime is wrong here, it
should only disable flags when running with geteuid() == 0.
No. +RTS
Hi ;)
2010/12/8 Mitar mmi...@gmail.com
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
DNK? I think you mean DNA.
Sorry. In my native language it is DNK. ;-)
the genotype program that develips the fenotype is much more smooth and
granular than a
On 08/12/2010 03:29 PM, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
Then build your CGIs restricted. Restricting the runtime by default,
*especially* when setting runtime options at compile time is so much of a
pain, is just going to cause problems. I'm already thinking that I may have
to skip ghc7.
With
Hi!
If you write a cabal setup script with user hooks, is there a way to tell
cabal-install that the setup script itself depends on some package from
hackage? (The dependency would be cabal-macosx in my case.)
Thanks,
Sönke
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing
On 8 December 2010 17:02, Sönke Hahn sh...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hi!
If you write a cabal setup script with user hooks, is there a way to tell
cabal-install that the setup script itself depends on some package from
hackage? (The dependency would be cabal-macosx in my case.)
No, the Cabal
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course there are smooth zones in the fitness landscape of any code. what
is necessary is to direct the process by avoiding absurd replacements
(mutations that goes straight to dead zones) and rules for changing
On Dec 8, 2010, at 5:58 AM, Peter Simons wrote:
do you by any chance remember which dependency that was? I wonder,
because I had no trouble compiling hledger 0.13's dependencies on a
standard GHC 6.12.3 system -- only hledger itself fails the cabal
configure stage --, so it seems to me like all
On 08/12/2010 02:40 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
A change to a gene does not make you to have a extra bone. It can make
you to have your hand slighltly longer. or shorter.
Actually I suspect it does - or at least can do. It's just a rather rare
event.
In fact there are metalevels of
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Duncan Coutts
duncan.cou...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2010 17:02, Sönke Hahn sh...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
Hi!
If you write a cabal setup script with user hooks, is there a way to tell
cabal-install that the setup script itself depends on some package
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
Then build your CGIs restricted. Restricting the runtime by default,
*especially* when setting runtime options at compile time is so much of
a pain, is just going to cause problems. I'm already thinking that I
may have to skip ghc7.
One
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce the first release of packdeps[1]. This is a
library and executable containing the same functionality as the
original packdeps website[2], namely letting you know when your
version bounds exclude the use of the newest version of a library
available. While the website
Hi all (again),
I'm happy to announce the second major release of the mime-mail[1]
package. mime-mail is a package providing support for rendering
multipart emails. This new release introduces:
* A partHeaders record, allowing you to place arbitrary headers on
individual parts of a message. This
On 11/29/2010 03:00 PM, John D. Ramsdell wrote:
only one other solution. Somehow the default behavior of the runtime
system must impose some reasonable limit. Here is the problem with
Shouldn't you configure your operating system to impose some reasonable
limit? That's not the job of the
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:29 AM, C. McCann c...@uptoisomorphism.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:41 AM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
I'm a bit surprised to find that there seems to be a lot of opposition
to this view, but perhaps the existing structure is more secure than I
thought?
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:11 +0200, Michael Snoyman wrote:
Hi all (again),
I'm happy to announce the second major release of the mime-mail[1]
package. mime-mail is a package providing support for rendering
multipart emails. This new release introduces:
* A partHeaders record, allowing you
Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com writes:
Hi all (again),
I'm happy to announce the second major release of the mime-mail[1]
package. mime-mail is a package providing support for rendering
multipart emails. This new release introduces:
* A partHeaders record, allowing you to place
Welcome to issue 161 of the HWN, a newsletter covering developments in
the [1]Haskell community in the week of November 28 - December 04.
Jan Snajder [2]announced the release of genprog, a genetic programming
library.
Ian Lynagh informed us that the haskell.org server migration is
I teach haskell quite a lot. I recommend using .ghci files in projects.
Today I received complaints about the fact that ghci will reject .ghci
if it is group-writeable. I didn't offer an opinion on the matter. I am
wondering if these complaints have legitimate grounds i.e. maybe you
want to have
30 matches
Mail list logo
