On 18:12 Sat 09 Jul , Tom Murphy wrote:
> Hi,
> I've found good explanations of the HaskellDB combinators, but I
> can't find good information about how to correctly define the database
> layout. Can anyone point me to a resource, or give a quick example?
>
> Thanks!
> Tom
Hello,
I wrot
Hi all,
we are working on a Haskell support plugin for IntelliJ IDEA, and need to
provide correct compilation of Haskell programs.
We compile the latter using GHC API, with options specifying .hi and .o
paths. For some reason, unlike a standalone GHC compilation, GHC API ignores
the values of the
Hi all. I'd like to announce docidx, a new tool for Haskell documentation:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/docidx
http://github.com/gimbo/docidx.hs
docidx is a program which creates a static HTML page indexing your installed
packages, with links to your local haddock docs and to each
I'm writing my first haskell package, how do i determine the minimal
dependency of it, for example, it use Data.Data, how do i know which version
of base package first introduce Data.Data module, i can't find the answer
with google.
--
http://www.yi-programmer.com/blog/
_
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, yi huang wrote:
> I'm writing my first haskell package, how do i determine the minimal
> dependency of it, for example, it use Data.Data, how do i know which version
> of base package first introduce Data.Data module, i can't find the answer
> with google.
You s
Based on the package versioning policy [1], A.B is a major version, so if you
know that it works with 1.2, then it is reasonably safe to specify the range >=
1.2 && <1.3, as no major api breaking changes should occur within the 1.2 range
(ie, 1.2.1 to 1.2.2, etc)
1. http://www.haskell.org/haske
DSL 2011: IFIP Working Conference on Domain-Specific Languages
6-8 September 2011, Bordeaux, France
Call for Participation: Online registration deadline July 30, 2011
Details of the program and accommodation are available at
http://dsl2011.bordeaux.inria.fr.
== Invited Speakers ==
I've been using docidx for a while now. It's a great little tool. I highly
recommend to anyone looking for a centralized documentation tool.
Jack
On Jul 15, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Andy Gimblett wrote:
> Hi all. I'd like to announce docidx, a new tool for Haskell documentation:
>
>http://hackag
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Jason Dagit wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Ertugrul Soeylemez wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I really like the way Animas (fork of Yampa) represents reactive
>> systems, and I would love to write some of my simulations using it.
Hi.
The Animas fork is s
On 16 July 2011 01:04, Daniel Patterson wrote:
> Based on the package versioning policy [1], A.B is a major version, so if
> you know that it works with 1.2, then it is reasonably safe to specify the
> range >= 1.2 && <1.3, as no major api breaking changes should occur within
> the 1.2 range (ie,
Hello,
Here is probably a good paper to get people up to speed on dependent
types (ironically written by two contributors to this mailing list??):
okmij.org/ftp/papers/lightweight-static-capabilities.pdf
Vasili
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haske
11 matches
Mail list logo