On 03/09/2011, at 03:04, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
On 3 September 2011 11:38, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
The result is that my first contact with haskell
arrays left me with the impression that they were complicated, hard to
use, and designed for someone with different
Greetings,
I'm a Python programmer who is relatively new to Haskell, so go easy on me :)
I have a program that uses (or will use) plugins to render output to
the user in a generic way. I'm basing the design of the plugin
infrastructure on the Plugins library, and have the following
interface:
data Renderer = Renderer {destroy :: IO (); render :: SystemOutput - IO ()}
newtype Initializer = Initializer {initialize :: IO Renderer}
Отправлено с iPad
03.09.2011, в 14:15, M. George Hansen technopolit...@gmail.com написал(а):
Greetings,
I'm a Python programmer who is relatively new to
Hi there,
I wanted to give the 2.1.0 version a try, so I followed the install
instructions on the website and downloaded one of the available Eclipse
packages (I chose Eclipse IDE for JavaScript Web Developers). Installing
EclipseFP then gave me the following error:
Cannot complete the install
Sorry, there was an error in the installation instructions. You need to
download a version of Eclipse with Java support (Eclipse for Java
developers, Eclipse for Java EE developers or Eclipse Classic).
If you find any other error, you can report it in the mailing list at
Is it possible to install it with GHC7.2 ? I tried and it can't compile scion.
David.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 06:01:49PM +0200, David Virebayre wrote:
Is it possible to install it with GHC7.2 ? I tried and it can't compile scion.
David.
I ran into this as well. The culprit appears to be MissingH, which
does not compile under ghc 7.2 because of conflicts between the base
and
Hi all,
I was wondering what people thought of a smarter do notation. Currently,
there's an almost trivial desugaring of do notation into (=), (), and
fail (grr!) which seem to naturally imply Monads (although oddly enough,
return is never used in the desugaring). The simplicity of the desugaring
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tasty.
On 04/09/11 12:34, Daniel Peebles wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering what people thought of a smarter do notation. Currently,
there's an almost trivial desugaring of do notation into (=), (), and
fail (grr!) which seem to naturally imply
On 4 September 2011 12:34, Daniel Peebles pumpkin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
For example, if I write in a do block:
x - action1
y - action2
z - action3
return (f x y z)
that doesn't require any of the context-sensitivty that Monads give you, and
could be processed a lot more efficiently
With parsers, for example, it amounts to you have a context-free vs. a
context-sensitive language. The functions hidden behind a monadic bind are
effectively opaque to any sort of analysis, whereas the static structure of
an applicative can be analyzed as much as you want. Ed Kmett does this in
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Max Rabkin max.rab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 03:15, M. George Hansen technopolit...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings,
I'm a Python programmer who is relatively new to Haskell, so go easy on me :)
I have a program that uses (or will use) plugins
Hello guys,
I googled for a real open source CMS application in Haskell but have no
luck.
So I'm wondering if Haskell is used very little in Web development area.
Thanks.
-Simon
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Dear Haskellers,
I'm a master student major of computer science and trying to find any
topics for my master thesis.
My mentor suggest me to find any topic I'm interested in.
Therefore I'm thinking whether there are some topics related to FP and
Haskell.
Especially use such technology to
14 matches
Mail list logo
