Re: [Haskell-cafe] How do I get official feedback (ratings) on my GSoC proposal?

2012-02-15 Thread Johan Tibell
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Ryan Newton wrote: > I'm interested in mentoring any projects related to concurrent data > structure implementation.  Is it too late to propose new projects? > > >  http://parfunk.blogspot.com/2012/02/potential-gsoc-haskell-lock-free-data.html Not all all. It's qu

[Haskell-cafe] Haskell Weekly News: Issue 215

2012-02-15 Thread Daniel Santa Cruz
Welcome to issue 215 of the HWN, a newsletter covering developments in the Haskell community. This release covers the week of February 5 to 11, 2012. You can find the HTML version of this issue at: http://contemplatecode.blogspot.com/2012/02/haskell-weekly-news-issue-215.html Quotes of the Week

Re: [Haskell-cafe] How do I get official feedback (ratings) on my GSoC proposal?

2012-02-15 Thread Ryan Newton
I'm interested in mentoring any projects related to concurrent data structure implementation. Is it too late to propose new projects? http://parfunk.blogspot.com/2012/02/potential-gsoc-haskell-lock-free-data.html -Ryan On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Johan Tibell wrote: > Yes. I rated some

[Haskell-cafe] Test suite sections of cabal

2012-02-15 Thread 山本和彦
Hello, I recently started using test suite sections of cabal but it soon appeared very inconvenient to me. 1) test data files If I want to include test data files into package, I have to enumerate all test files since the usage of '*' is restricted. I just want to specify the top directory

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Undocumented cost-centres (.\) using auto-all, and SCC pragma not being honored

2012-02-15 Thread Thomas Schilling
On 15 February 2012 16:17, Dan Maftei wrote: > > 1 When profiling my code with -auto-all, my .prof file names some > sub-expressions with a backslash. Cf. below. What are these? > >      e_step >       e_step.ewords >       e_step.\ >        e_step.\.\ >         e_step.update_counts >       e_ste

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-Cafe Tag (was: Optimizations and parallel execution in the IO for a small spellchecker)

2012-02-15 Thread JP Moresmau
OK, thanks all, I can stop worrying being an uncouth Frenchman, then... JP On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 14:49, JP Moresmau wrote: >> >> I was not aware that it was something a poster was supposed to do, but >> now I notice that while the mess

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-Cafe Tag (was: Optimizations and parallel execution in the IO for a small spellchecker)

2012-02-15 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 14:49, JP Moresmau wrote: > I was not aware that it was something a poster was supposed to do, but > now I notice that while the messages I get from the list have > [Haskell-Cafe] on their subject, the ones I post don't. > The list software adds it. You don't see it beca

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-Cafe Tag (was: Optimizations and parallel execution in the IO for a small spellchecker)

2012-02-15 Thread Antoine Latter
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:49 PM, JP Moresmau wrote: > I was not aware that it was something a poster was supposed to do, but > now I notice that while the messages I get from the list have > [Haskell-Cafe] on their subject, the ones I post don't. The > Haskell-Cafe info page > (http://www.haskell.

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Haskell-Cafe Tag (was: Optimizations and parallel execution in the IO for a small spellchecker)

2012-02-15 Thread JP Moresmau
I was not aware that it was something a poster was supposed to do, but now I notice that while the messages I get from the list have [Haskell-Cafe] on their subject, the ones I post don't. The Haskell-Cafe info page (http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe) does not mention that you sh

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GHC -WAll, -fwarn-unused-do-bind and Cabal

2012-02-15 Thread JP Moresmau
Yes, I would have suspected that the doc was wrong, and indeed the latest version on GHC 7.4 does not mention that flag as being excluded, but the fact is that through the GHC API, I don't get that warning! I can get other warnings so I would say that the way I use the API is correct.In the GHC 7.0

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GHC -WAll, -fwarn-unused-do-bind and Cabal

2012-02-15 Thread Albert Y. C. Lai
On 12-02-14 03:01 PM, JP Moresmau wrote: I'm confused: I'm using GHC 7.0.2 and Cabal 1.10.1.0 with cabal-install 0.10.2. I use -Wall in my Cabal file. If I build a Haskell file with unused do binds, via the GHC API I get no warning, which is normal, since the doc states: The warnings that are not

[Haskell-cafe] [Haskell-Cafe] Optimizations and parallel execution in the IO for a small spellchecker

2012-02-15 Thread Paul Sujkov
Sorry, I've forgotten to add a [Haskell-Cafe] tag for the message. On 15 February 2012 19:33, Paul Sujkov wrote: > Hi everyone, > > http://hpaste.org/63732 > > that's a very simple spellchecker application: it consumes standard Linux > dictionary, reads a file, and prints out words from that fil

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Concurrency strategy for 2 threads and rare events

2012-02-15 Thread JP Moresmau
Thank you all, I've used a simple IORef and that did the trick. JP 2012/2/8 Edward Amsden : > If you only need one structure for communication (e.g. neither thread > needs to lock multiple things) you might consider using an IORef, and > writing/polling it with atomicModifyIORef. It's cheaper tha

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Hackage 2 maintainership

2012-02-15 Thread Duncan Coutts
On 14 February 2012 10:43, Kirill Zaborsky wrote: > I apologize, > But does hackage.haskell.org being down for some hours already has something > with the process of bringing up Hackage 2? No, completely independent. The server was down for a few hours (and I think restored in the morning by the

[Haskell-cafe] Optimizations and parallel execution in the IO for a small spellchecker

2012-02-15 Thread Paul Sujkov
Hi everyone, http://hpaste.org/63732 that's a very simple spellchecker application: it consumes standard Linux dictionary, reads a file, and prints out words from that file that are not on the dictionary. I have taken it from a little cross-language benchmark and used to benchmark existing hash t

[Haskell-cafe] Undocumented cost-centres (.\) using auto-all, and SCC pragma not being honored

2012-02-15 Thread Dan Maftei
> > 1 When profiling my code with -auto-all, my .prof file names some sub-expressions with a backslash. Cf. below. What are these? e_step e_step.ewords e_step.\ e_step.\.\ e_step.update_counts e_step.fwords My e_step function binds seven expressions inside a

Re: [Haskell-cafe] podcast?

2012-02-15 Thread Magnus Therning
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 15:05, serialhex wrote: > Does anybody know of any good haskell/fp podcasts out there?  i dont know if > my googling skillz are just failing me, but i can't seem to find anything. >  thanks all! Software Engineering Radio (http://www.se-radio.net/) has had a few episodes c

[Haskell-cafe] podcast?

2012-02-15 Thread serialhex
Does anybody know of any good haskell/fp podcasts out there? i dont know if my googling skillz are just failing me, but i can't seem to find anything. thanks all! hex -- * my blog is cooler than yours: http://serialhex.github.com * The wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. They bring you

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Behavior of -threaded in GHC 7.4.1?

2012-02-15 Thread Michael Craig
Ok, so I've found that using the -V0 RTS flag to turn off the RTS clock (and associated signals) makes the code run fine with -threaded. I'm still digging through the implications of that, though. Has some behavior here changed in 7.4.1? Mike Craig On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Michael Craig

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Language Shootout

2012-02-15 Thread David Hotham
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=llvm+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fshootout.alioth.debian.org%2F "Louis Wasserman" wrote in message news:CA+tXMXOmVYvGfAiFsf-uVv7rRv7e=vUv=mxtr-dtnnvmr12...@mail.gmail.com... Out of curiosity, do we know why the Language Shootout has upgraded to GHC 7.4.1, but still isn't using -f

Re: [Haskell-cafe] [haskell-cafe] Some reflections on Haskell

2012-02-15 Thread David Waern
2012/2/15 Aristid Breitkreuz : > In the source file, the Haddock documentation is there, no idea why it > doesn't show up. Thanks, this could be a bug in the new Haddock version. We'll look into it. David ___ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@hask