I am happy to announce a new version of time-recurrence, a library of
functions for generating recurring sequences of dates:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/time-recurrence
New in version 0.9.0 is a redesigned top layer API. Previously
recurrences were described by combining generating fun
okmij.org> writes:
>
> >
> > I implemented hDeleteMany without FunDeps -- and it works in Hugs (using
> > TypeCast -- but looks prettier in GHC with equality constraints).
>
> It is nice that hDeleteMany works on Hugs. I forgot if we tried it
> back in 2004.
Thanks Oleg -- but it was only 8
> We could even have a "report spam" button on each page, and if enough
> users click on it (for a given revision), the revision gets forwarded to a
> moderator.
I think, this will be of real use, but should be used along with CAPTCHA
because then spammers may "report spam" for everything and an
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:46 PM, wren ng thornton wrote:
> On 7/30/12 5:35 PM, Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:
>
>> - Block creation of usernames
>> o ending with two or more digits
>> o with more than one x or q
>> o starting with "buy"
>> o longer than 20 characters
>> o with more than 4 consonants in
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Geddes
wrote:
>
> Richard O'Keefe Said:
>>> Ouch! And that's not even very deeply nested.
>>> Imagine 4 or 5 levels deep. It really makes
>>> Haskell feel clunky next to `a.b.c.d = val`
>>> that you see in other languages.
>>
>>I was taught that this kind o
On 7/30/12 5:35 PM, Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:
- Block creation of usernames
o ending with two or more digits
o with more than one x or q
o starting with "buy"
o longer than 20 characters
o with more than 4 consonants in a row
As other's've mentioned, many of these constraints impose undue burden
On 7/30/12 9:51 PM, Christian Sternagel wrote:
Thanks Wren, for the explanations (also in your previous mail)!
On 07/30/2012 01:29 PM, wren ng thornton wrote:
On 7/24/12 9:19 PM, Christian Sternagel wrote:
(x == y) = True ==> x = y
(x == y) = False ==> not (x = y)
(x == _|_) = _|_
(_|_ == y) =
I'm new to Haskell, but I do like your idea.
I prefer this as a built-in feature because it will create a standard
way of doing this, making the question "wich package should I use to
get mutatos? lens-foo, lens-bar, monad-lens, lens-lens-foo-bar, ...?"
simply go away.
So, yes, I up-vote your ide
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 01:50:50PM +, Amy de Buitléir wrote:
> I'm developing a framework for artificial life experiments that I would like
> to
> make available on Hackage eventually. I've read all the guidance and
> proposals I
> could find for where to place packages in the hierarchy:
>
>
Richard O'Keefe Said:
>> Ouch! And that's not even very deeply nested.
>> Imagine 4 or 5 levels deep. It really makes
>> Haskell feel clunky next to `a.b.c.d = val`
>> that you see in other languages.
>
>I was taught that this kind of thing violates the Law of Demeter
>and that an object should not
First of all I'd like to thank everyone who participated in this
discussion! Most approaches look very promising, especially the last
is what I imagined, but were unable to write. Thanks for that,
especially.
I will try to solve my problem using these approaches and report back
once I succeed or r
Thomas Schilling :
> You may concatenate the licenses of all the packages you are using. GHC
> includes the LGPL libgmp. The license file for each package is mentioned in
> the .cabal file.
>
>
If you need a version of GHC free of the LGPL, you can build GHC from source
using the package 'int
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Butterfield
wrote:
>
> On 2 Aug 2012, at 09:25, Erik Hesselink wrote:
>
>> Isn't this exactly the problem solved by all the lens packages?
>> Current popular ones are fclabels [0] and data-lens [1].
>>
>> [0] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/fclabels
>> [1
Ah yes - the joy of Haskell
It so easy to roll your own, rather than search to find someone else's
(better/more elegant) solution... :-)
On 2 Aug 2012, at 11:41, Erik Hesselink wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Butterfield
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2 Aug 2012, at 09:25, Erik Hesselin
On 2 Aug 2012, at 09:25, Erik Hesselink wrote:
> Isn't this exactly the problem solved by all the lens packages?
> Current popular ones are fclabels [0] and data-lens [1].
>
> [0] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/fclabels
> [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/data-lens
Not sure what all of
Isn't this exactly the problem solved by all the lens packages?
Current popular ones are fclabels [0] and data-lens [1].
[0] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/fclabels
[1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/data-lens
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jonathan Geddes
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> tl;dr
On 2/08/2012, at 5:34 PM, Jonathan Geddes wrote:
> Ouch! And that's not even very deeply nested.
> Imagine 4 or 5 levels deep. It really makes
> Haskell feel clunky next to `a.b.c.d = val`
> that you see in other languages.
I was taught that this kind of thing violates the Law of Demeter
and that
17 matches
Mail list logo
