On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 21:10:24 +0200, Justin Greene
wrote:
Anyone have a download link for the haskell platform for windows? I
can't
find one with hackage down.
This link depends on the OS you are using; I found the Haskell Platform
page in the Web Archive[0]. The downloads are at the G
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:
> It should be pretty easy to write an adapter function of type "String ->
> (Show a => a)".
>
Not with that type. Give it a try.
Hint: what is the extension of the type variable 'a'? What do you know
about it? How would you use that t
Anyone have a download link for the haskell platform for windows? I can't
find one with hackage down.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Thomas DuBuisson <
thomas.dubuis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It will be down most of today - we are switching over to a new network
> connection.
>
> On Sat, Aug 11,
It should be pretty easy to write an adapter function of type "String ->
(Show a => a)".
On Aug 11, 2012 12:34 PM, "Patrick Palka" wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:14 AM, wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd like to point out that the only operation we can do on the first
>> argument of MkFoo is to show to it.
+Malcom
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:31 AM, hanjoosten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hackage seems to be down. Is there anyone out here who knows how to get it
> online again?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Hackage-is-down-tp5715912.html
> Sent fro
It will be down most of today - we are switching over to a new network
connection.
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:31 AM, hanjoosten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hackage seems to be down. Is there anyone out here who knows how to get it
> online again?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> htt
Hi,
Hackage seems to be down. Is there anyone out here who knows how to get it
online again?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Hackage-is-down-tp5715912.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:14 AM, wrote:
>
> I'd like to point out that the only operation we can do on the first
> argument of MkFoo is to show to it. This is all we can ever do:
> we have no idea of its type but we know we can show it and get a
> String.
>
That's not all you can do: you can als
Has anyone used existential types to represent items on a schedule in a
scheduled lazy data structure?
On Aug 11, 2012 4:15 AM, wrote:
>
> > data A = A deriving Show
> > data B = B deriving Show
> > data C = C deriving Show
> >
> > data Foo = forall a. Show a => MkFoo a (Int -> Bool)
> >
> > inst
Responding to the list..
-- Forwarded message --
From: Benjamin Edwards
Date: 11 August 2012 17:37
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] hGetContents Illegal byte sequence / ghc-pkg
To: David McBride
Thank you Gents,
Most useful. One thing that had escaped me is that of course, even if
I had this same problem a couple weeks ago when trying to install
virthualenv and I don't really understand it got into a bad state, but the
way I solved it was by fixing the locale settings on my gentoo machine so
that I'm using UTF8. That just involved a few changes in /etc and then the
problem
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Benjamin Edwards wrote:
> inspecting the source of readProcessWithExitCode yields an obvious
> explanation to the MVar problem, but I don't understand why hGetContents is
> so offended.
>
I think last time I looked into this there was no normalization of
package.c
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 12:13:45PM +0100, Benjamin Edwards wrote:
> Hello café,
>
> I have a program that is crashing, and I have no idea why:
>
> module Main
> where
>
> import System.Process (readProcessWithExitCode)
>
>
> main :: IO ()
> main = do _ <- readProcessWithExitCode "ghc-pkg" ["
Hello café,
I have a program that is crashing, and I have no idea why:
module Main
where
import System.Process (readProcessWithExitCode)
main :: IO ()
main = do _ <- readProcessWithExitCode "ghc-pkg" ["describe", "hoopl"] ""
putStrLn "Should never get here"
this is using the proce
> data A = A deriving Show
> data B = B deriving Show
> data C = C deriving Show
>
> data Foo = forall a. Show a => MkFoo a (Int -> Bool)
>
> instance Show Foo where
>show (MkFoo a f) = show a
I'd like to point out that the only operation we can do on the first
argument of MkFoo is to show to
Timo von Holtz wrote:
> class Test a where
> foo :: Monad m => m a
>
> instance Num a => Test a where
> foo = return 1
>
> instance Test Int where
> foo = return 2
>
> test constr = fromConstrM foo constr
I'm afraid the type checker is right. From the type of fromConstrM
fromConstrM :: f
Anthony Clayden wrote:
> So three questions in light of the approach of abandoning FunDeps and
> therefore not getting interference with overlapping:
> A. Does TTypeable need to be so complicated?
> B. Is TTypeable needed at all?
> C. Does the 'simplistic' version of type equality testing suffer p
17 matches
Mail list logo
