Say you write
data Callback = Error ... | ...
because one of the kinds of callbacks you need to model is an error
callback.
Then, later, you write
data Error = ...
to model some error that can happen.
They're both good names, but there's a conflict. So I started thinking I
should prefix my
I found syntax reference here.
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/syntax-iso.html
consym-(: {symbol | :})reservedop
symbol-ascSymbol | uniSymbolspecial | _ | : | | '
constrs-constr1 | ... | constrn(n=1)
Regards,
Tomo
On Saturday, June 22, 2013, Brian Lewis wrote:
Say you write
data
What is the recommended method
to find the exact reason for a stack overflow
(when running a Haskell program compiled with ghc)?
When I compile with -prof -auto-all, and run with +RTS -xc,
I see a very short call stack, which can't be right.
But that's probably because I am calling some library
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 04:26:14AM -0500, Brian Lewis wrote:
Say you write
data Callback = Error ... | ...
[...]
Then, later, you write
data Error = ...
[...]
They're both good names, but there's a conflict.
What do you mean by a conflict? That's fine as far as the compiler is
concerned
I feel I may be doing a lot of programming with Arrows in the near future.
Currently I'm delighted that Arrow notation[1] exists. It makes using
Arrows much less painful.
Are there any best-practices I should be aware of with Arrows? Or is it
just a case of getting on with it?
Tom
1.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:04:21 + (UTC)
Johannes Waldmann waldm...@imn.htwk-leipzig.de wrote:
What is the recommended method
Try to use heap profiling. There is very high probability that the
problem is because of space leak.
--
Aleksey Uymanov s9gf4...@gmail.com
Tom Ellis tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2...@jaguarpaw.co.uk wrote:
Are there any best-practices I should be aware of with Arrows? Or is
it just a case of getting on with it?
The best practice is probably to avoid them. If your type is a monad,
there is little reason to use the awkward arrow
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Carlo Hamalainen
ca...@carlo-hamalainen.net wrote:
On 18/06/13 04:23, Mihai Maruseac wrote:
I was wondering if we have similar movies for Haskell as
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLO1djacsfg and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3418SeWZfQ exist for Java.
I
o...@okmij.org wrote:
I'm late to this discussion and must have missed the motivation for
it. Specifically, how is your goal, vector/tensor operations that are
statically assured well-dimensioned differs from general
well-dimensioned linear algebra, for which several solutions have been
Our team at IntelliFactory has worked with monadic formlets for a while,
we call them flowlets, in the context of WebSharper/F#. We even have an
obscure paper out there about it. The difference with your approach is that
we are working directly with DOM nodes and imperative widgets to execute
Aleksey Uymanov s9gf4ult at gmail.com writes:
Try to use heap profiling. There is very high probability that the
problem is because of space leak.
Really? Would it help in the standard example:
main = print $ foldr (+) 0 [1 .. 1::Int]
this leaks space (that is, cannot run in small
I have a similar problema with the ids of formlets of different branches of
execution. For example in the first case statement the branch represented
can be one or the other depending on the previous user response.
The identifiers of each branch must be different or else, the
server application
As you may know, I've been writing a shell in Haskell called
Plushhttps://code.google.com/p/plush/
.
I'm working on the look of the terminal input and output, and I want to do
a little data gathering.
I want to know what your terminal looks like!
You can help me by:
1) Download this file:
Hi Ertugul. Thanks for taking the time to write me an in-depth reply! I
have a few comments and a question.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 03:36:15PM +0200, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
Tom Ellis tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2...@jaguarpaw.co.uk wrote:
Are there any best-practices I should be aware of with
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 06:09:58AM +0300, Mihai Maruseac wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Omari Norman om...@smileystation.com
wrote:
I compiled some code with GHC 7.6.3 that produces a simple error at runtime
myProgramName: loop
At which point the program exits with code 1.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:15:07PM +0100, Tom Ellis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 04:26:14AM -0500, Brian Lewis wrote:
Say you write
data Callback = Error ... | ...
[...]
Then, later, you write
data Error = ...
[...]
They're both good names, but there's a conflict.
What do
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 07:05:09PM +0100, Tom Ellis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 03:36:15PM +0200, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
If the interface is not under your control, make yourself comfortable
with the complete arrow syntax, most notably how it handles operators,
combinators and the `(|
On 06/22/2013 01:28 PM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
3) Do not resize the terminal window
and
5) Take a screen shot of the whole terminal window
are mutually exclusive?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.comwrote:
On 06/22/2013 01:28 PM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
3) Do not resize the terminal window
and
5) Take a screen shot of the whole terminal window
are mutually exclusive?
No, he wants a window shot, not a whole-screen
You're overthinking it. I just sent a whole screen.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com
wrote:
On 06/22/2013 01:28 PM, Mark Lentczner wrote:
3) Do not resize the terminal window
20 matches
Mail list logo
