Hello all,
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString. Why is it
map :: (Word8 - Word8) - ByteString - ByteString
but
zipWith :: (Word8 - Word8 - a) - ByteString - ByteString - [a]
? Obviously they can be transformed into each other with pack/unpack, and as I
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Tom Ellis wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString. Why is it
map :: (Word8 - Word8) - ByteString - ByteString
but
zipWith :: (Word8 - Word8 - a) - ByteString -
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString. Why is it
map :: (Word8 - Word8) - ByteString - ByteString
but
zipWith :: (Word8 - Word8 - a) - ByteString - ByteString - [a]
Well, what if you
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:24:24 +0400, Tom Ellis
tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2...@jaguarpaw.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString.
Why is it
map :: (Word8 - Word8) - ByteString -
Scott: benchmark the two and you'll see why we have both :-)
On Thursday, September 12, 2013, Scott Lawrence wrote:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Tom Ellis wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 09:21:20AM -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote:
Something's always bothered me about map and zipWith for ByteString. Why
Carter: we don't have both. We have one function from each category. My
guess is nobody's ever really needed a really fast zipWith ::
(Word8-Word8-Word8) - ByteString - ByteString - ByteString; that's the
only reason I can think of for its omission.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Carter
I did use that a couple of times (`xor`ing 2 ByteStrings together), and was
surprised by the omission back then, but IIRC (can't validate now), there's
a specialised zipWith (as proposed) in the module (with some other name,
obviously), which is not exported, but used when you 'pack' the result of
On 09.09.2013 20:24, Duncan Coutts wrote:
Well-Typed and the
Industrial Haskell Group (IHG) are very pleased
to announce that
Hackage 2 is now available for public beta testing.
[new features]:
http://beta.hackage.haskell.org/new-features
Package candidates.
You may have noticed that
+1
Cucumber seems to be great if you mainly want to read your code
over the telephone, distribute it via national radio broadcast, or
dictate it to your secretary or your voice recognition software. You can
program thus without having to use you fingers. You can lie on your back
on your sofa,
I've long been interested in a scripting language designed to be spoken.
Not interested enough to go about making it happen... but the idea is
fascinating and possibly useful.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Andreas Abel andreas.a...@ifi.lmu.dewrote:
**
+1
Cucumber seems to be great if
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM, David Thomas davidleotho...@gmail.comwrote:
I've long been interested in a scripting language designed to be spoken.
Not interested enough to go about making it happen... but the idea is
fascinating and possibly useful.
On 13-09-10 09:27 PM, Thiago Negri wrote:
The package GLFW is not building in Cabal 1.18.
Setup.hs [1] depends on `rawSystemStdInOut` [2] that changed signature
between 1.16 and 1.18.
Consider cabal install --cabal-lib-version=1.16.
Replace 1.16 by the correct number. Use ghc-pkg list Cabal
Have you tried AppleScript? I wouldn't say it's pleasant to use, but it's
easy to read.
On Thursday, September 12, 2013, David Thomas wrote:
I've long been interested in a scripting language designed to be spoken.
Not interested enough to go about making it happen... but the idea is
Hi all,
I have released dns library version 1.0.0.
This version provides new APIs. Thus, version is now 1.0.0. The design
and implementation was done by Michael Orlitzky based on his
experience.
Enjoy!
--Kazu
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
On 09/11/13 19:37, John Lato wrote:
I didn't see this message and replied privately to Michael earlier, so
I'm replicating my comments here.
1. Sooner or later I expect you'll want something like this:
class LooseMap c el el' where
lMap :: (el - el') - c el - c el'
It covers the case of
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Nicolas Trangez nico...@incubaid.com wrote:
I did use that a couple of times (`xor`ing 2 ByteStrings together), and was
surprised by the omission back then, but IIRC (can't validate now), there's
a specialised zipWith (as proposed) in the module (with some
I've just read Semantic Versioning (SemVer) [1], Package Versioning Policy
(PVP) [2] and Eternal Compatibility in Theory (ECT) [3].
Is PVP the one that every package on Hackage should use?
SemVer seems to make more sense to me.
Also, ECT looks very promising, but it is dated back to 2005 and I
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:37 AM, John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't see this message and replied privately to Michael earlier, so I'm
replicating my comments here.
Sorry about that, I wrote to you privately first and then thought this
might be a good discussion for the cafe.
1.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Mario Blažević blama...@acanac.net wrote:
On 09/11/13 19:37, John Lato wrote:
I didn't see this message and replied privately to Michael earlier, so
I'm replicating my comments here.
1. Sooner or later I expect you'll want something like this:
class
19 matches
Mail list logo
