I'm trying to build snap-0.6 on win7/x64 with the current 64-bit
haskell platform.
I have the mingw compilers from the platform in $PATH, and I can get
the network and snap-server modules to build. But snap-0.6 fails:
[18 of 31] Compiling Snap.Snaplet.Internal.Types (
src\Snap\Snaplet\Inter
On Aug 9, 2011, at 7:17 PM, John Lato wrote:
>> From: Brandon Allbery
>>
>> Yes, because now it's finding the system readline, which isn't actually
>> readline (Apple ships a "readline" which is actually BSD "editline", so you
>> get missing symbols for things editline doesn't support such as com
I've tried off and on the last couple of days to build Lambdabot on Mac OS X
(before and after the upgrade from 10.6 to 10.7) and I keep running into linker
errors with the 64-bit Haskell Platform (ghc 7.0.3).
First, there's the issue with linking against libiconv, which is solved this
way:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Don Stewart wrote:
> Exactly: focus on what the user wants to do (e.g. write multicore code,
> write safe code, write code quickly), not how that is achieved:
> "bounded parametric polymorphism" or "monads"
Parametric polymorphism is a big win, and highlights some
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Interesting, but how is it when it comes to availability of up-to-date
> Haskell packages? If it's based on Ubuntu 8.10 then I'd expect out of
> date GHC and a need to use cabal-install extensively.
Well, my machine just died and I'm wait
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I've decided to shop around for other options when it comes to a Debian
> distro to put on my Eee PC 900. Since it has no HDD I want something
> that isn't too bloated (some is all right) and ideally leaves up to me
> what to install and w
On 6/19/07, Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, Haskell only has 1 type of collection: linked lists. (And only
single-linked at that.) While other "normal" programming languages spend
huge amounts of effort trying to select exactly the right collection
type for the task in hand, Has
On 1/13/06, Sebastian Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> blocks = map concat . groupBy (const (not . null)) . lines
Thanks. That's a little more involved than I was looking for, but that
certainly looks better than pattern matching on ('\n':'\n':rest). ;-)
For the record, lines removes the tra
Hi,
I'm trying to split a string into a list of substrings, where substrings
are delimited by blank lines.
This feels like it *should* be a primitive operation, but I can't seem
to find one that works. It's neither a fold nor a partition, since each
chunk is separated by a 2-character sequence.
On 9/15/05, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not only that, but IMAP has a way where you can embed, say {305} instead
> of a string. That means, "after you finish reading this line, read
> exactly 305 bytes, and consider that to be used here." But if you see
> "{305}" (the double quotes
10 matches
Mail list logo
