On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 20:53 +0200, Andrea Rossato wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I' m new to Haskell and try to find my way through types and monads.
> I tried the yet Another Haskell Tutorial, very useful for types, but
> almost unreadable for monads (that's my perspective!).
> Then I discovered that wonder
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 11:59 +0200, Tamas K Papp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:26:45AM +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
>
> > See also
> > http://www.xoltar.org/languages/haskell.html
> > http://www.xoltar.org/languages/haskell/CSV.hs
>
> Thanks. Haskell is incredibly neat ;-)
>
Hi everyone -
I'm very much a Haskell newbie, but have followed Haskell (and the
various Haskell sites) for quite a few months now, and I absolutely
*love* the language.
One thing that **fascinated** me a while ago was the site which gave
Haskell code for a "Haskell-based fileserver/OS" using
Stefan Holdermans wrote:
Andy,
Many thanks again - I'll make this my last post for at least a week
or two (to give others some bandwidth) -
Well, if you are having difficulties learning the language, you really
shouldn't hold back on asking questions, of course. So, please, do ask
those q
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Stefan,
Sunday, August 14, 2005, 2:05:00 PM, you wrote:
SH> let format line = "[" ++ concat (intersperse "," (words line)) ++ "]"
SH> return $ map (mkVec . read . format) $ lines str -- CORRECTED
or just
return $ map (mkVec . map read . words) $ lines str
Hi all -
I'm trying to run some code posted recently on this list ( the exact
URI is as follows -
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/7860
( The reason I'm doing this is because this code is quite close to
what I'm trying to do. )
Anyway, I saved the code in a file call
Greg Buchholz wrote:
Andy Elvey wrote:
a) Using Haskell to read a delimited file (with column-headings) into a
columnar or tabular data-structure -
Parsec (http://www.cs.uu.nl/~daan/parsec.html) is a great parsing
library in Haskell.
Greg Buchholz
Hi Greg - thanks very
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
btw, afaik Spirit is modeled after ParseC (parsing combinators)
haskell library and Phoenix was needed for this library because parser
combinators require lazy functional language to work :)
Hi Bulat - thanks for this!
I didn't know that about Phoenix. Certainly
Hi everyone -
I'm a relative newcomer to Haskell, and am very much besotted with it
- it's a great language! :-)
At the moment, I'm in the early stages of putting together a little
"Haskell-like" language using the Spirit parser framework (Spirit is
part of the Boost C++ libraries). Spi
On Saturday 06 November 2004 05:49 pm, Peter Simons wrote:
> Since I have been experimenting with Arrows quite a bit just
> recently, I feel compelled to add something to the
> discussion.
>
> I too think that Arrow are a beautifully simple and elegant
> concept. However, once you write production
On Saturday 06 November 2004 08:36 am, you wrote:
< snip >
>
> It might be an immense project, but I also think it would be interesting.
> I wonder if Haskell would be much faster after being restructured around
> arrows.
> If an arrow-based version of Haskell existed, I'd love to try it.
>
>
Hi again -
Apologies for another post from me so soon (and for replying to my own
post).
Regarding my post about arrows and Haskell (and the idea of trying to
define Haskell's grammar in terms of arrows) - upon thinking about that, I'm
pretty much of the opinion that it'd be an immens
Hi all -
I'm a first-timer here, and am *very* much attracted by Haskell's elegance
and power ... :-)
I have only poked around briefly with Haskell so far (at the "hello world"
level). One thing that I have come across, and which really got me thinking,
was the page on the Haskell websi
13 matches
Mail list logo