Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
It looked like it passed the option, but didn't resolve the issue.
Anyone seen that before? See error in previous post.
--
Berlin Brown
http://botspiritcompany.com/botlist/spring/help/about.html
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
f the docs. Either
> > way.
> >
> > My code got as far as connecting to the server, sending the protocol
> > out and getting back an initial response. I didnt build a queue
> > message (frame) or much else.
> > --
> > Berlin Brown
> > http://botspir
nalyze the protocol and just go off the docs. Either
way.
My code got as far as connecting to the server, sending the protocol
out and getting back an initial response. I didnt build a queue
message (frame) or much else.
--
Berlin Brown
http://botspiritcompany.com/botlist/spring/help/
On Nov 18, 2007 8:01 PM, Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:37 -0500, Berlin Brown wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 2007 7:32 PM, Berlin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am sure many of you have looked at the scheme in haskell examp
On Nov 18, 2007 7:32 PM, Berlin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure many of you have looked at the scheme in haskell example that
> is on the web by Jonathan Tang. If you are familiar with the code, I
> need a little help trying to add scheme style comments:
>
>
I am sure many of you have looked at the scheme in haskell example that
is on the web by Jonathan Tang. If you are familiar with the code, I
need a little help trying to add scheme style comments:
"; This is my comment"
I added this code here and I think it works (I replaced the name
parseSpa
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:19 PM, Berlin Brown wrote:
Sterling Clover wrote:
I hacked together a version that I'm pretty happy with today.
Started off trying an algorithm with channels and forking, then
realized that in Haskell thanks to referential transparency we can
get parallelism almos
Sterling Clover wrote:
I hacked together a version that I'm pretty happy with today. Started
off trying an algorithm with channels and forking, then realized that
in Haskell thanks to referential transparency we can get parallelism
almost for free, and redid it all in Control.Parallel (below).
Isaac Dupree wrote:
Mushfeq Khan wrote:
I'm new to Haskell and am trying to find a good way to organize my HUnit
tests. Having used some of the other XUnit frameworks, I tended towards
trying to organize them all in a parallel "test" folder structure,
but this
seems to be a bad fit for Haskell
