Re: Functional programming in Python

Interestingly enough, I have the same feeling with Python! > As for the difficulty with imperative constructs, I agree it's not > even an issue for many (Dylan, ML, et. al.) languages, but for Haskell it > still is, in my humble opinion. I found the task of writing a simple program > that did a f

Re: Interesting: "Lisp as a competitive advantage"

- Original Message - From: "Norman Ramsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:16 AM Subject: Re: Interesting: "Lisp as a competitive advantage" > > http://www.paulgraham.com/paulgraham/avg.html > > > > I wonder how Haskell compares in this regar

Re: Backtracking (Was: What do you think about Mercury?)

Several people, including myself in my long forgotten thesis, have shown that these are equivalent. Erik - Original Message - From: "Jerzy Karczmarczuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 5:08 AM Subject: Backtracking (Was: What do you think about Mer

Re: Literate Programming in Haskell?

You also might take a look at Maarten Fokkinga's mira.sty http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~mbs/src/textools/ and Mark Shileds' abbrev.sty which was derived from that http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~mbs/src/textools/. Erik - Original Message - From: "Patrik Jansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Just for your fun and horror

Why should we change and not C? Erik - Original Message - From: "Jan Skibinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jerzy Karczmarczuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 1:17 AM Subject: Re: Just for your fun and horror > > > On Fr

Re: GHC Core output

I would *really* love to see GHC componetized (TM); it would even be better if it would become easier to use the pieces. I would like to do experiments on smaller bits of the compiler using Hugs (ideally the whole thing!). When I was working on the Java/.NET backend I had to rebuild the whole comp

Re: Learning Haskell and FP

> Forgive me if I am ignorant, but who claimed that Haskell was an "imperative" language? > > Also, in order to take full advantage of Haskell, it would seem necessary to > get used to functional programming style (the Haskell school of expression, in particular). > It seems that using Haskell as

Re: Learning Haskell and FP

> > But it raises the issue of an appropriate animal mascot > > for > > the cover; I can only come up with the Uakari, an > > exotic-looking > > rainforest monkey, which sounds similar to "Curry". > > > > (look here for a picture:) > > > > Wow

Haskell --> Java was Re: (no subject)

Have a look at Erik - Original Message - From: "Chris Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 1:44 AM Subject: (no subject) > I was wondering if > Has anybody had access to a Haskell -> Java compiler/transla