Interestingly enough, I have the same feeling with Python!
As for the difficulty with imperative constructs, I agree it's not
even an issue for many (Dylan, ML, et. al.) languages, but for Haskell it
still is, in my humble opinion. I found the task of writing a simple
program
that did a few
- Original Message -
From: Norman Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: Interesting: Lisp as a competitive advantage
http://www.paulgraham.com/paulgraham/avg.html
I wonder how Haskell compares in this regard.
I loved
Why should we change and not C?
Erik
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Skibinski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jerzy Karczmarczuk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: Just for your fun and horror
On Fri, 16 Feb
I would *really* love to see GHC componetized (TM); it would even be better
if it would become easier to use the pieces. I would like to do experiments
on smaller bits of the compiler using Hugs (ideally the whole thing!). When
I was working on the Java/.NET backend I had to rebuild the whole
Have a look at http://www.mondrian-script.org
Erik
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Angus" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 1:44 AM
Subject: (no subject)
I was wondering if
Has anybody had access to a Haskell - Java compiler/translator.
