py to
talk to you about the possibilities.
If you are interested, send me a mail with details how I could get in touch:
han joosten atosorigin com
cheers
Han.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Suggestions-for-an-MSc-Project--tp29067884p29100221.html
Sent from the Ha
Thanx Daniel! This did the trick.
Han.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/eclipse%2C-haskell-platform-and-windows.-Installation-problem.-tp28438196p28440001.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
id, but I cannot figure out what I should do.
Any help is welcome!
Thanks!
Han Joosten
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/eclipse%2C-haskell-platform-and-windows.-Installation-problem.-tp28438196p28438196.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing
lot of packages to say 'cabal install ' at the command prompt
to get your package up and running. I think that this is pretty cool, and
most non-technical users should be able to get this to work without a lot of
pain.
Cheers,
Han Joosten
--
View this message in context:
http://old.
Last weekend a new version of the haskell platform has been released. I was
expecting that also for windows the ghc 6.12 would be in it. However, when I
follow the link:
http://hackage.haskell.org/platform/windows.html
I still get the 'old' version (2009.2.0.2) which contains ghc 6.10
Is this
Hi Neil,
Thanks for the file. This helps me a great deal moving to GHC 6.12.1 on my
windows machine!
Cheers, Han
Neil Mitchell wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> I uploaded my latest version which works with GHC 6.12.1:
>
> http://community.haskell.org/~ndm/temp/cabal.zip
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> Thank
Han Joosten
Neil Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Have you tried compiling cabal-install with GHC 6.12.1? I got these
>> stream
>> errors after I compiled it with 6.10.4, but with 6.12.1 it's working
>> flawless.
>
> Woohoo, your tip works! Thanks a lot.
>
> Neil
&
knyttr wrote:
>
> 1. suppose I have a function like this
>
> fun x y z = ...
> fun x y [] = ...
> fun x [] [] = ...
> where
> ...
>
> the "where" term will be applied just to the last definition. is it
> possible to force it to all "fun" definitions?
>
The last two parts of your definit
Tanks for replying.
I now see what went wrong:
I went to http://www.haskell.org/cabal/release/cabal-install-0.8.0/
http://www.haskell.org/cabal/release/cabal-install-0.8.0/ , because I had
read that I needed the 0.8.0 version. I read the page, and grabbed the
cabal.exe binary, assuming that i
re out what that should be.
I am the only user of my windows machine, and I have admin rights.
Any suggestions are welcome!
Han Joosten
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/problems-installing-cabal-on-windows-tp27363309p27363309.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing
are, in lists, however i get errors like
Couldn't match expected type `Rule' against inferred type `SgRule'.
Is there any other (even trivial?) way to get this done? I know Haskell well
enough to know that it is possible, but I don not know Haskell well enough
to know how to do it :t
tooling available?
Any suggestions would help a lot! Thanx for reading.
Han Joosten
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/analyzing-modules-import-export-tp19297359p19297359.html
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com
12 matches
Mail list logo