year will be to not read any email on the 1st. I'll
just wait until the 2nd to read it all. Foolproof!
Hmm, nope, still failed. I was following along until it got to HERP at
which point I scrolled back up to see that it was sent on the 1st and then
continued to read and LOL.
-R. Kyle Murphy
it might
not actually work, although I see no reason why it shouldn't. It's also
fragile, as if wikipedia changes just about anything it could all brake, but
that's the risk you run anytime you resort of site scraping.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Thu, Sep 8
of
functional programming, are simply too foreign to most peoples imperative
way of approaching problems.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 16:29, Limestraël limestr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, the xmonad approach is very neat, but I see 2 major (IMO
printUpTo with 100 -}
main :: IO ()
main = printUpTo 100
--- End Code ---
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 13:15, Samuel Williams
space.ship.travel...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Kyle,
I've recevied the following program. You did a fantastic job
enough to inherit contracts from functions used and display these
derived contracts this would be a very simple way to find all the edge cases
of your code.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:56, John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue
,
and passes them both to pass. -}
run :: Int - [Door]
run n = foldl (flip pass) (replicate n *Closed*) [0..n]
main = print $ run 100
--- End Code ---
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 06:43, Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto
be
higher. The only argument to support non-strict typing would be if you could
show that it takes less time to track down runtime bugs than it does to fix
compile time type errors, and any such claim I'd be highly skeptical of.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat
That's also the approach Yi uses. I'm fairly certain there's a library on
hackage that makes writing up programs in that style fairly trivial,
although I can't remember the details right now. I'd look up Yi as a
starting point.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat
in a similar
direction. At the very least those of us not in both the web-devel and
haskell-cafe mailing lists might want to check the other one out.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 14:12, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
3) Configuration
accessed through the proxy). I don't know enough about happstack to answer
his question, but I can see from the documentation you provided that there
doesn't seem to be any way to specify address to bind to as Dmitry stated in
his original e-mail.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance
as
didn't realize you could initialize a socket using the Network.Socket
functions and just pass that instead. The example in your latest mail is
much clearer.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:35, Martin Kiefel m...@nopw.de wrote
)
in Just (s1 ++ s2 ++ s3 ++ s4)
else Just Bad Guess
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 17:42, Brent Yorgey byor...@seas.upenn.edu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:42:44PM +0100, Sebastian Hungerecker wrote:
On 09.03.2010 20:04
I likewise agree this isn't a job for Hoogle, but on a related note see my
previous post in here about needing better documentation (specifically a
proper manual for most hackage pages, not just a bare bones API doc):
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2009-October/067969.html
-R. Kyle
on something like that being available on any browser except your own.
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 03:22, Mathijs Kwik bluescreen...@gmail.com wrote:
There used to be http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Yhc/Javascript, which
is a great plan
use map
or zip like so:
map (\x - (x,x)) [1,2,3] -- applies a function to each member, in this
case the lambda \x - (x,x) which just makes a tuple
zip [1,2,3] [1,2,3] -- combines two lists into one by making each element
of the joined list a tuple of one element from each list
-R. Kyle Murphy
is why when you try
to store [1,2,3] in the IORef you get back [(),(),()]. Try this instead and
it should work:
let aaa = unsafePerformIO $ newIORef ([] :: [Int])
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 01:02, zaxis z_a...@163.com wrote:
let
://hackage.haskell.org/package/DeepArrow
Bad API docs (but once again with a link to average manual/tutorial):
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/actor
-R. Kyle Murphy
--
Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 16:29, John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Derek
17 matches
Mail list logo
