Hi,
Good question. I'd like to know the answer too.
Cheers,
Alex.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has looked at OpenCL as target for Data Parallel
> Haskell? Specifically, having Haskell generate CL kernels, i.e. SIMD
> vector type aw
all just to show user of that
function what kind of parameters function expects! :-D
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:47 AM, wren ng thornton wrote:
> Olex P wrote:
>
>> This idea with new level of abstraction is good but in some cases it can
>> make things overcomplicated / less eff
e Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Olex P wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Dumb question about declaring a function and type synonyms.
> > There are to different declarations of the same function:
> >
> > attrNames :: String -> AttrDi
Hi everyone,
Dumb question about declaring a function and type synonyms.
There are to different declarations of the same function:
attrNames :: String -> AttrDict -> [String]
attrNames :: AttrClass -> AttrDict -> AttrNames
First gives you the idea about exact types it expects (except AttrDict f
Okay looks like FFI is the only way to go, Thanks.
Cheers,
Oleksandr.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:50 PM, wren ng thornton wrote:
> Olex P wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I mean "sizeOf 2". It's useful not only on GPUs but also in "normal"
>>
the Floating, RealFloat, RealFrac, etc, classes so should
>> operate largely the same as (modulo precision) a Double.
>>
>> -Ross
>>
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Olex P wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>
the Floating, RealFloat, RealFrac, etc, classes so should
>> operate largely the same as (modulo precision) a Double.
>>
>> -Ross
>>
>>
>> On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Olex P wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>
Hi guys,
Do we have anything like half precision floats in Haskell? Maybe in some non
standard libraries? Or I have to use FFI + OpenEXR library to achieve this?
Cheers,
Oleksandr.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskel
Awesome!
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
> This is seriously cool stuff!!!
>
> Maybe it's time to start a "Haskell Demo Scene" :-)
>
> (what's a "demo scene"? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demoscene )
>
> PS: Note that Conal Elliott also was generating GPU code using
Thanks for explanation Sean!
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Sean Leather wrote:
>
>
>> "Existential types" sounds a bit scary :)
>>
>>>
> It's unfortunate that they've developed a scariness feeling associated with
> them. They can be used in strange ways, but simple uses are quite
> approachab
; Geometry Two -> Geometry Three
>
> perimeter :: Geometry Two -> Double
> perimeter (Circle _ r) = 2*pi*r
>
> Tom
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Olex P wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > It's a dumb question but I'd like to know a right answ
Cool. It's more and more clear guys.
Thanks a lot. I'll check that "expression problem".
"Existential types" sounds a bit scary :)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Sean Leather wrote:
>
>
>> Perimeter doesn't make sense for Sphere or Cylinder. So we could define a
>> type class for objects that
his:
perimeter :: Geometry -> Double
perimeter (Sphere _ r) = 0.0
perimeter (Circle _ r) = 2.0 * pi * r
The latter is even simpler because there is no need in extraction of Double
value from Maybe.
So the question is still there: do I need a type class?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Olex P
_ r) = Just $ 2.0 * pi * r
>
> list = [Sphere (1,1) 1, Circle (2,2) 2]
>
> main = (print . catMaybes . map perimeter) list
>
> --- [12.566370614359172]
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Olex P wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > It's a dumb question but I'd lik
Hey guys,
It's a dumb question but I'd like to know a right answer...
Let's say we have some geometry data that can be Sphere, Cylinder, Circle
and so on. We can implement it as new data type plus a bunch of functions
that work on this data:
data Geometry = Sphere Position Radius
Cool! Thanks Ryan!
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Ryan Ingram wrote:
> 2009/1/24 Olex P :
> > What I want to ask you guys can we define a function with arbitrary
> number
> > of parameters? Actually not really arbitrary but just several
> possibilities
> > (as we h
it 2d, 3d or 4d case.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
> 2009/1/24 Olex P
>
>> But you know it doesn't make too much sense because I also have to define
>> addition Scalar + Vector (that means construct vector from scalar and add a
>> vector), Vecto
t commutative in this case
>
> 2009/1/24 Olex P
>
>> Yeah guys. I confused myself. I forgot why I had to implement several "+"
>> operators (^+^, ^+, ^+. etc.) for Vector class. Now I've got an idea again.
>> Different names make a perfect sense.
>>
&
n S. Allbery KF8NH
>
>> On 2009 Jan 23, at 17:58, Olex P wrote:
>>
>> class Vector v where
>> (^+^) :: v -> v -> v
>>
>> class Matrix m where
>> (^+^) :: m -> m -> m
>>
>>
>> You can't reuse the same ope
Well if telepaths on vacation...
class Vector v where
(^+^) :: v -> v -> v
data Vector3 = V3 !Double !Double !Double
instance Vector Vector3 where
(V3 x1 y1 z1) ^+^ (V3 x2 y2 z2) = V3 (x1 + x2) (y1 + y2) (z1 + z2)
class Matrix m where
(^+^) :: m -> m -> m
data Matrix3 = M
Hello Haskellers!
It's probably a simple question but I can't find a proper solution...
Suppose we have a class Vector which overloads (+) operation. I'd like to
represent a Matrix data type as a set of vectors:
data Matrix3 = M3 !Vector3 !Vector3 !Vector3
In this case (+) for matrices could be i
Hi guys,
Any ideas how to integrate Haskell into other software as scripting engine?
Similarly to Python in Blender or GIMP or to JavaScript in the products from
Adobe. Which possibilities we have?
Cheers,
Alex.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:20 PM, David F. Place <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, A
Thank you guys, I'll check it.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Henning Thielemann <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Olex P wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>>
>> Sorry for a silly questions but I didn't find a proper answer in Google.
>> I
Hi guys,
Sorry for a silly questions but I didn't find a proper answer in Google.
I've started to learn Haskell and would like to implement a library for work
with vectors. I found different implementations of this stuff but all of
them made just for fun in a short as possible terms using lists or
24 matches
Mail list logo
