next, carry, feed, roll
On 6 August 2013 08:37, KC <kc1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought a pure value was being returned from the monad. :) > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Christian Sternagel < > c.sterna...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear Jurriën. >> >> personally, I like "lift" (which is of course already occupied in >> Haskell), since an arbitrary value is "lifted" into a monad. (The >> literature sometimes uses "unit".) >> >> cheers >> >> chris >> >> >> On 08/06/2013 02:14 PM, J. Stutterheim wrote: >> >>> Dear Cafe, >>> >>> >>> Suppose we now have the opportunity to change the name of the `return` >>> function in Monad, what would be a "better" name for it? (for some >>> definition of better) >>> >>> N.B. I am _not_ proposing that we actually change the name of `return`. >>> I do currently have the opportunity to pick names for common functions in a >>> non-Haskell related project, so I was wondering if there perhaps is a >>> better name for `return`. >>> >>> >>> - Jurriën >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >>> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org >>> http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe> >>> >>> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe> >> > > > > -- > -- > Regards, > KC > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe